tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38538211725323334252024-03-05T16:35:32.473+00:00Oswald Innocence CampaignTHIS SITE IS DEDICATED TO SATIRE AND PARODY A GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS LED BY SENIOR MEMBER AND FOUNDER RAFF SINK*
(*Not His Real Name)bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.comBlogger37125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-36586360283464099462028-05-06T16:58:00.000+01:002018-11-04T14:07:06.637+00:00Welcome.....<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KXkrtGGmU8k/W978mluhuXI/AAAAAAAAR_M/kc5VLA00EAImgD877psjwPbJ-qoUbAkQQCLcBGAs/s1600/Ralphbw.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="140" data-original-width="111" height="200" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KXkrtGGmU8k/W978mluhuXI/AAAAAAAAR_M/kc5VLA00EAImgD877psjwPbJ-qoUbAkQQCLcBGAs/s200/Ralphbw.jpg" width="158" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* Sink...the man, the myth, the mudder rucker</div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-75363760194254809402018-11-04T13:53:00.001+00:002018-11-04T14:13:55.219+00:00Founded in Fetzering Part 7dAs Raff* takes refuge in his latest rabbit hole, I'm going to wind down the discussion of Raff*'s reasons why Billy Lovelady can't be Billy Lovelady.....there will be future discussion on Lovelady.<br />
<br />
Years ago, Lance Uppercut created a series of GIFs to show the very discernible pattern of Billy Lovelady's shirt. (if you.re new here, there's a link right over there to his page >>>>>)<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XMzDvaaVJt8/W95yU2B8_zI/AAAAAAAAR-g/VZwWD2CrcwIPQNxLxWBUguNjvgrU-RBPwCLcBGAs/s1600/loveladydpd.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="351" data-original-width="282" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XMzDvaaVJt8/W95yU2B8_zI/AAAAAAAAR-g/VZwWD2CrcwIPQNxLxWBUguNjvgrU-RBPwCLcBGAs/s320/loveladydpd.JPG" width="257" /></a></div>
Lovelady's shirt had a series of horizontal and vertical, black and white stripes There was something unique about the stripes as well. The horizontal white stripe alternated as to being either above or below the black stripe.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3ro_dMl_kDw/W951zx2Fv4I/AAAAAAAAR-s/l2jJ94VuTxsN3xmKpiurlAwaqK13d6IiACLcBGAs/s1600/stripes.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="383" data-original-width="539" height="454" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3ro_dMl_kDw/W951zx2Fv4I/AAAAAAAAR-s/l2jJ94VuTxsN3xmKpiurlAwaqK13d6IiACLcBGAs/s640/stripes.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Lance offered the following... He took sections of Lovelady's shirt and placed them side by side on the Altgens 6 photograph to show the alignment of the horizontal stripes.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dq8JPaVvyYQ/W952sVF2zHI/AAAAAAAAR-0/dq4uidx7VbwzXLlXbK25UQiPzvacvDNMQCLcBGAs/s1600/Shirt%2BLined%2BFinal%2Ba.gif.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="486" data-original-width="256" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dq8JPaVvyYQ/W952sVF2zHI/AAAAAAAAR-0/dq4uidx7VbwzXLlXbK25UQiPzvacvDNMQCLcBGAs/s320/Shirt%2BLined%2BFinal%2Ba.gif.gif" width="168" /></a></div>
<br />
Lance also produced this where he actually overlaid the sections of shirt to show how well they matched.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-QIVF7PG-V1g/W954TtPBzkI/AAAAAAAAR_A/F-281UXPzxsbyTiviUGif4ex0BlrcGdjwCLcBGAs/s1600/Shirt%2BOverlay%2BFinal%2Ba.gif.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="486" data-original-width="256" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-QIVF7PG-V1g/W954TtPBzkI/AAAAAAAAR_A/F-281UXPzxsbyTiviUGif4ex0BlrcGdjwCLcBGAs/s320/Shirt%2BOverlay%2BFinal%2Ba.gif.gif" width="168" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Lance does good work.<br />
<br />
Raff* has written blog after blog trying to explain how his advanced training as Chiropractor and starvation Dr. allows him greater insight into how Lovelady's fashion choice was actually Oswald's shirt. That's actually how Raff* convinced Jim Fetzer to turn his warped spotlight on Raff*. Fetzer swallowed Raff*'s bullshit about pseudo-lapels, thicker vs. thinner, it all comes down to the shirt.<br />
<br />
Raff* made a video that was on Youtube but it was taken down after it was ridiculed by many. He remade the video. I don't normally directly link to the idiot's stuff but I'll make an exception for this...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/G_3sCGPQ3zk/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/G_3sCGPQ3zk?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
It's the lapel folks. Different shirt means a different man. It's settled. Everyone can pack up their laser levels and card tables and reproduced limos and conferences and nonsensical books and go home.<br />
<br />
Raff* solved it. Fetzer was waiting for the part where Raff* explained how Da Joooos were involved but got bored and moved on with his Judyth Very Faker project. Then we had Sandy Hook and Raff* was left alone on his soapbox while moths fluttered through the twisted illumination brought on by Fetzer's spotlight.<br />
<br />
Hollow footsteps echoed across the stage and the ominous sound of an electrical throw switch left Raff* alone, in the dark. His nemesis Judyth had taken the warmth of illumination and reduced it to a cricket, in heat. Judyth stole his man. (She's a playa...you shoulda read the book).<br />
<br />
So Raff* changed his theyory to one of simple cabeza chicanery. Someone only altered Oswald's head to make him look more like Lovelady.<br />
<br />
This is Raff*'s argument in a nut shell. It had to be either Oswald or Lovelady.<br />
<br />
Well, um....no Raff*. Lovelady was seen standing in and identified in the photo as standing in that spot, at that moment in time.<br />
<br />
Oswald wasn't. By anyone. Ever.<br />
<br />
<br />
More to come..... <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-60862165676890704192018-04-29T20:09:00.000+01:002018-05-12T11:37:44.227+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 7cNow we get to the section on the OIC website that gives all of the reasons that Billy Lovelady cannot be Billy Lovelady. I apologize for this part taking this long to post. Quite frankly, it's hard to read such constant bullshit and know where to begin. This portion of the OIC website is the next most ridiculous, only behind the 7 anomalies which I will cover soon. <br />
<br />
Here we go....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-auTqreOWG4Y/Wt9lmBCwswI/AAAAAAAARyI/1zJjiP-B_Cok7K8T26xHBjtsdK4eWYCdQCLcBGAs/s1600/72.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="139" data-original-width="788" height="112" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-auTqreOWG4Y/Wt9lmBCwswI/AAAAAAAARyI/1zJjiP-B_Cok7K8T26xHBjtsdK4eWYCdQCLcBGAs/s640/72.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Sorry to burst Raff*'s bubble, but there are multiple, reliable images of Billy Lovelady. Raff* just refuses to admit it, because it destroys his own delusion.<br />
<br />
Billy Lovelady was a guy that happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. His name has been dragged through the mud by Raff* Sink and the OIC for simply showing up to work and watching the "parade" as the President was killed. He was hounded by the likes of Mark Lane and posthumously, by Raff* Sink for simply being a guy that resembled an arrested Lee Harvey Oswald, from over 200 feet away, in a grainy black and white photo. His existence and early demise was a perfect opportunity for whackjobs around the world to make his life meaningless, by wiping him from the steps of the TSBD and claiming their golden haired loser was actually the one standing there. It's all a bunch of bullshit and quite sickening if you think about it. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-H9876VGEeF8/Wt9l-UNkVhI/AAAAAAAARyQ/t8Lxsf9bEJYRL-1le74FIxGXdh05XkHQACLcBGAs/s1600/73.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="416" data-original-width="415" height="320" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-H9876VGEeF8/Wt9l-UNkVhI/AAAAAAAARyQ/t8Lxsf9bEJYRL-1le74FIxGXdh05XkHQACLcBGAs/s320/73.JPG" width="319" /></a></div>
I'm not sure why Raff* has chosen this photo, as being the only reliable photo of Lovelady, unless it's because moonbat Mark Lane hired someone to take it.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGW0lxO39bUCz9ZiepjOk-jA5-2-XfkGgU7JKGn9cA99Cnjn7v0DliTb0kuwvkrb8KIW6bshMZ6FG6zYrGl9a7V72rgYQsteQruF-Rid3ZnIrQtm2ztJC0kfvD6oRFOg3feZ49LXkVEicn/s1600/74.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="155" data-original-width="740" height="134" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhGW0lxO39bUCz9ZiepjOk-jA5-2-XfkGgU7JKGn9cA99Cnjn7v0DliTb0kuwvkrb8KIW6bshMZ6FG6zYrGl9a7V72rgYQsteQruF-Rid3ZnIrQtm2ztJC0kfvD6oRFOg3feZ49LXkVEicn/s640/74.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
The entire paragraph above is pure bullshit.<br />
<br />
It has been pointed out to Raff* repeatedly, that there are plenty of examples of people with thinning hair where their hair looks thinner under certain conditions. Raff* can't grasp the simple. Everything has a sinister origin. In the photo above, Lovelady is looking down while walking but according to Raff*, people don't do that. Just recently in his famous "floating hat" picture, he claims that is impossible for someone to look down while walking.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6a8iiplJJNtTfrAOHvE9WdeRqn1VCb8AnNmtWIJYhgMmdvJIbJXAv7dIvn278Qd7nt3ccVUsz-4uu4miiBusZhyphenhyphenVCqNi0P0ZdLmOuS32lQ38U4RkE5LnoAho-VI4_x30J7vBwLOawCiLl/s1600/hat.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="490" data-original-width="551" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6a8iiplJJNtTfrAOHvE9WdeRqn1VCb8AnNmtWIJYhgMmdvJIbJXAv7dIvn278Qd7nt3ccVUsz-4uu4miiBusZhyphenhyphenVCqNi0P0ZdLmOuS32lQ38U4RkE5LnoAho-VI4_x30J7vBwLOawCiLl/s1600/hat.JPG" /></a></div>
Apparently, Raff* has no knowledge of blind people walking around every day. But then Raff* is blind to most things that people with common sense understand. Billy Lovelady would never bring food up and down an open outer shirt. People's hair always looks the same regardless of lighting or photographic conditions.<br />
Raff* Sink is a walking contradiction. Police officers can't look down and walk but in the only "reliable" photo of Billy Lovelady, Lovelady can.<br />
<br />
Here is Lance Uppercut schooling Raff* on his failure to understand how photographs work...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-frqmJrN6duk/WuJOVNwis-I/AAAAAAAAR1o/y9iOfefimkkynb_koCO0DrXYAeVbO_txgCLcBGAs/s1600/snooker1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="660" data-original-width="544" height="640" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-frqmJrN6duk/WuJOVNwis-I/AAAAAAAAR1o/y9iOfefimkkynb_koCO0DrXYAeVbO_txgCLcBGAs/s640/snooker1.JPG" width="526" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oB5jG-u90S4/WuJOkjhV5wI/AAAAAAAAR1s/AreJXf6q8OkeuWFRYdo7oAhCfnquPMa1gCLcBGAs/s1600/haze.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="610" data-original-width="557" height="640" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oB5jG-u90S4/WuJOkjhV5wI/AAAAAAAAR1s/AreJXf6q8OkeuWFRYdo7oAhCfnquPMa1gCLcBGAs/s640/haze.JPG" width="584" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://oswaldinthedoorwaynotreally.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/zero-zip-zilch-updated-plus-further-update-and-just-one-more/">https://oswaldinthedoorwaynotreally.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/zero-zip-zilch-updated-plus-further-update-and-just-one-more/</a></div>
<br />
Now for Raff*'s ear collage....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LEHbT2aMbm4/Wt943qXAe3I/AAAAAAAARy0/sfI4EV-624oeqURoLtPZkz_xfN1T3BMfACLcBGAs/s1600/75.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="366" data-original-width="730" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LEHbT2aMbm4/Wt943qXAe3I/AAAAAAAARy0/sfI4EV-624oeqURoLtPZkz_xfN1T3BMfACLcBGAs/s640/75.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
You can clearly see that Lovelady's ear in the left picture sticks out from his head, further than Oswald's. Raff* chooses to make a comparison with the only "reliable" picture of Lovelady, on the right because with Lovelady's head looking down, it gives the impression that his ears stick out further than on the left, but they don't.<br />
<br />
There's more...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dObzouBiKU8/Wt95cT1C3YI/AAAAAAAARzA/2Vb6pPHHvfs4zwMdPdabuYyZoUOoiSs6QCLcBGAs/s1600/76.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="407" data-original-width="742" height="350" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dObzouBiKU8/Wt95cT1C3YI/AAAAAAAARzA/2Vb6pPHHvfs4zwMdPdabuYyZoUOoiSs6QCLcBGAs/s640/76.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Now Raff* chooses to make comparisons with pictures that he says were altered. How can you make a comparison between pictures if you know one was altered? Raff* is full of crap. The picture on the left shows his ear sticking out. The photo on the right shows his ears stick out to the side and don't lay back.<br />
<br />
Raff* Sink is a two bit con man trying to claim the he proved the impossible. Unfortunately for Raff*, Billy Lovelady is Billy Lovelady. And Raff* will certainly say more about that later.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GYiN_i2mxrM/Wt96c1fuoPI/AAAAAAAARzI/TFZHZbgBsAYIeYfTr_SgKEbnb5ZsoOwYACLcBGAs/s1600/77.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="436" data-original-width="707" height="394" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GYiN_i2mxrM/Wt96c1fuoPI/AAAAAAAARzI/TFZHZbgBsAYIeYfTr_SgKEbnb5ZsoOwYACLcBGAs/s640/77.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Raff* likes to make up words. There is no "hard" version of anything. One photo was developed and it was copied altering the contrast of the photo. But Raff* can't tell you which is which because he doesn't know the source of the photos. He does a yahoo search and pulls things from other websites and never checks to see where the image originated. So according to Raff*, one of the mysterious "they" made a version of the photo hard for some nefarious purpose.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WxLcBfpJBPw/Wt97Qm3kNeI/AAAAAAAARzQ/O6XL5rc-aiEa5VOzRfMLixF5pNumU1-FwCLcBGAs/s1600/78.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="178" data-original-width="751" height="150" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WxLcBfpJBPw/Wt97Qm3kNeI/AAAAAAAARzQ/O6XL5rc-aiEa5VOzRfMLixF5pNumU1-FwCLcBGAs/s640/78.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Again, pure bullshit. Raff* has no proof that anyone did anything for a specific purpose. Billy Lovelady apparently had a habit of wearing his shirt partially unbuttoned. He did it on that day and on Novermber 22 when he was standing in the doorway of the TSBD. Proof of this is that he was captured by two news cameras, in the police department, when they brought Oswald in after arrest. Raff* has no proof that the FBI asked Lovelady to do anything. Raff* repeatedly states that Lovelady claimed to be wearing a red and white stripped shirt up until March of 1964. That's strange when you consider that he identified himself in Altgens 6 within a day after the shooting and recognized himself in copies of Altgens 6 that appeared in newspapers and magazines. He even pointed out that fact to the FBI on the day they said he said he was wearing a red and white stripped shirt.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/--AmMFXIIoHQ/Wt98rYEE3RI/AAAAAAAARzc/fBXtqwbiR04XfwOVPkJOXcJKgWWKaeVYgCLcBGAs/s1600/79.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="140" data-original-width="752" height="118" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/--AmMFXIIoHQ/Wt98rYEE3RI/AAAAAAAARzc/fBXtqwbiR04XfwOVPkJOXcJKgWWKaeVYgCLcBGAs/s640/79.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Bullshit. Lovelady identified himself in a copy of Altgens 6 when the FBI questioned him within a day of the assassination.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1oZiL1zzqq0/Wt99Cu0PwtI/AAAAAAAARzk/aGUpWO970_IivZYDiYCABLdXllV301dagCLcBGAs/s1600/80.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="242" data-original-width="590" height="262" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1oZiL1zzqq0/Wt99Cu0PwtI/AAAAAAAARzk/aGUpWO970_IivZYDiYCABLdXllV301dagCLcBGAs/s640/80.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* has been harping on the statement by the FBI claiming that Lovelady stated he was wearing a red and white stripped shirt. However, Raff* tries to downplay something pointed out to him by Robin Unger years ago....Lovelady also identified himself in Altgens 6 on that day. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gNczogZ6Rcc/Wt-CxxxH_HI/AAAAAAAARz0/ddZSUKIb0E4cXflpWl1Dqeor38A7uFoaACLcBGAs/s1600/love4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="686" data-original-width="694" height="632" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gNczogZ6Rcc/Wt-CxxxH_HI/AAAAAAAARz0/ddZSUKIb0E4cXflpWl1Dqeor38A7uFoaACLcBGAs/s640/love4.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Now why didn't the FBI catch the fact that Lovelady said he was the "Doorman" and yet wasn't wearing a red and white stripped shirt? The FBI fucked up. Wasn't the first time in this case. But Raff* insists that Lovelady didn't claim to be the "Doorman" until May. That again, is bullshit....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-C_KS8BI6oM0/Wt-DbWkKayI/AAAAAAAARz8/KoO40NhsZHQHcaKpw4NuZMmKQmv_l6kWACLcBGAs/s1600/love1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="594" data-original-width="904" height="420" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-C_KS8BI6oM0/Wt-DbWkKayI/AAAAAAAARz8/KoO40NhsZHQHcaKpw4NuZMmKQmv_l6kWACLcBGAs/s640/love1.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
And it wasn't just Lovelady making the claim....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-phcKEjiEc3s/Wt-DtEC20hI/AAAAAAAAR0E/uFVUSgDNqroZVEaEk-hGnC_9MCjvdxj9wCLcBGAs/s1600/love2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="529" data-original-width="895" height="378" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-phcKEjiEc3s/Wt-DtEC20hI/AAAAAAAAR0E/uFVUSgDNqroZVEaEk-hGnC_9MCjvdxj9wCLcBGAs/s640/love2.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8_vA_uXPv2E/Wt-D1l1P3AI/AAAAAAAAR0I/qLyrf47YpJsVNJ6KnVSyyjFclg5zPp6hgCLcBGAs/s1600/love3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="587" data-original-width="895" height="418" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8_vA_uXPv2E/Wt-D1l1P3AI/AAAAAAAAR0I/qLyrf47YpJsVNJ6KnVSyyjFclg5zPp6hgCLcBGAs/s640/love3.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* has been shown this evidence, before. It doesn't matter to Raff* because he can still holler FAKE!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aBGPLBGGbDQ/Wt-FT0iPXUI/AAAAAAAAR0g/q5U36ICHCko4zFJmOsX7zWWGJyOwgSwswCLcBGAs/s1600/81a.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="78" data-original-width="742" height="66" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aBGPLBGGbDQ/Wt-FT0iPXUI/AAAAAAAAR0g/q5U36ICHCko4zFJmOsX7zWWGJyOwgSwswCLcBGAs/s640/81a.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
There is one still photograph of Billy Lovelady wearing a plaid shirt on November 22, 1963 and it was sent around the world....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zUDZqYP30ro/Wt-I0a8cfzI/AAAAAAAAR0s/Ze8hY5PryYEZpEPzLgiA_ZB1_WW_Cyv5gCLcBGAs/s1600/Altgens%2BPhoto%2B%2528Extra%2BLarge%2BVersion%2529%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1039" data-original-width="1600" height="414" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zUDZqYP30ro/Wt-I0a8cfzI/AAAAAAAAR0s/Ze8hY5PryYEZpEPzLgiA_ZB1_WW_Cyv5gCLcBGAs/s640/Altgens%2BPhoto%2B%2528Extra%2BLarge%2BVersion%2529%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Ed0Cb3pl3Z4/Wt-JB9yt13I/AAAAAAAAR0w/e5TmDEnzcoU0-7NwZkQ4LUjtTqodHa65wCLcBGAs/s1600/82.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="499" data-original-width="765" height="417" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Ed0Cb3pl3Z4/Wt-JB9yt13I/AAAAAAAAR0w/e5TmDEnzcoU0-7NwZkQ4LUjtTqodHa65wCLcBGAs/s640/82.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
The film from which the still shot above was taken, is legit.<br />
<br />
The proof is the film taken by Hughes....<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8ede64jV-AQ/Wt-K7mpi0XI/AAAAAAAAR08/hVpvFCPYrF8FM8pmwbqGG0xoKWvb-rnugCLcBGAs/s1600/martinhughessynch100prkc9v.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="272" data-original-width="720" height="240" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8ede64jV-AQ/Wt-K7mpi0XI/AAAAAAAAR08/hVpvFCPYrF8FM8pmwbqGG0xoKWvb-rnugCLcBGAs/s640/martinhughessynch100prkc9v.gif" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Credit: JFK Assassination Photo Research Galleries</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
There's Billy Lovelady with his bald spot and reverse widow's peak standing on the steps of the TSBD.<br />
A perfect example of how two different cameras can capture the same thing and it look different. Raff* claims that both of the films are fake but has absolutely no proof to back up his claim. None. I repeat, None.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-JmKUPmOdHC8/Wt-NG2LV1rI/AAAAAAAAR1I/3cEWUkPEkuEeIeB__SBFddmifsUPekjMgCLcBGAs/s1600/83.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="305" data-original-width="749" height="260" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-JmKUPmOdHC8/Wt-NG2LV1rI/AAAAAAAAR1I/3cEWUkPEkuEeIeB__SBFddmifsUPekjMgCLcBGAs/s640/83.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Dr. Wrone is another crackpot who happened upon the JFK scene prior to Raff*. But Raff* thinks that his own inability to research a subject proves his claims to be true. Instead of doing the research, Raff* screams FAKE! and expects the world to believe him. Raff* is an idiot. The information behind the DCA film is out there for anyone with "google" to find. Raff*'s hero, Harold Weisberg has the information from Trask's <i>Pictures of the Pain </i>right there in his archive that describes how the film came about. But that would mean that Raff* would have to give up his ripped-off crusade. I say ripped-off because Raff* is just regurgitating 50 year old tripe with a new "fashion sense" twist. The guy went from the "bowels" of the medical world, Chiropractics to "fasting" Doctor which is even lower on the evolutionary chain of quackery. Give me a fucking break.....<br />
<br />
Here's Raff*'s most recent comments about the Martin film...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-V95QPbh2Mjc/Wt-OHBmANiI/AAAAAAAAR1Q/kvD5Z2tWitAyO6HSAUzdqnHchfHz9QXvACLcBGAs/s1600/mutha.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="478" data-original-width="549" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-V95QPbh2Mjc/Wt-OHBmANiI/AAAAAAAAR1Q/kvD5Z2tWitAyO6HSAUzdqnHchfHz9QXvACLcBGAs/s1600/mutha.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
No, fuck you Raff*. The majority of researchers find the Martin film to be corroboration of the claims that Billy Lovelady was exactly who he claimed to be...the guy standing in the doorway of the TSBD as captured in Altgens 6.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gOz0kqR016o/Wt-PMEn_FhI/AAAAAAAAR1Y/zqBmAOz1Um0yh1diQq2rO4ZX8GA2_CBsQCLcBGAs/s1600/84.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="492" data-original-width="752" height="416" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gOz0kqR016o/Wt-PMEn_FhI/AAAAAAAAR1Y/zqBmAOz1Um0yh1diQq2rO4ZX8GA2_CBsQCLcBGAs/s640/84.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
If Raff* had taken the trouble to research the films he's ripped off, he might have found out that one piece was enhanced or cleaned up. But that's too much work for Raff*. He'd rather stay ignorant to facts because if he admitted that the martin film was legit, he'd have to remove a good portion of his website and a bazillion blog posts. Keep in mind that Raff* claimed that the Martin film proved Lovelady was definitely wearing a plaid shirt on the day of the assassination. Then when he realized his screw up, he screamed FAKE!<br />
<br />
More to come.... <br />
<br />
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-6489668609340103992018-04-22T23:31:00.000+01:002018-04-22T23:31:00.957+01:00Series Note 5Raff* be pissed.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YZxwlX2okfw/Wt0MJ9iDdwI/AAAAAAAARxw/NsGLxCcCb04GxUCuOFV-UAOJxX4IAxBVgCLcBGAs/s1600/pissed.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="142" data-original-width="459" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YZxwlX2okfw/Wt0MJ9iDdwI/AAAAAAAARxw/NsGLxCcCb04GxUCuOFV-UAOJxX4IAxBVgCLcBGAs/s1600/pissed.JPG" /></a></div>
Oh dear...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DDTuKaDAZrw/Wt0NGJ8N-DI/AAAAAAAARx4/epkNbeb6AmMBMrsjEznoZN6NMmecIV9vgCLcBGAs/s1600/453%2B-%2BCopy%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="494" data-original-width="543" height="291" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DDTuKaDAZrw/Wt0NGJ8N-DI/AAAAAAAARx4/epkNbeb6AmMBMrsjEznoZN6NMmecIV9vgCLcBGAs/s320/453%2B-%2BCopy%25281%2529.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-43666372904098192302018-04-22T19:47:00.002+01:002018-04-22T19:47:34.371+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 7bI continue with the rantings of Raff* Sink and his band of Incompetent Clowns...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-d5Ncea8sUus/WtyBWlMRS_I/AAAAAAAARpE/a-aWqW4VesE4AKIoOdcp2sm8fQc4Ud0IACLcBGAs/s1600/41.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="601" data-original-width="758" height="507" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-d5Ncea8sUus/WtyBWlMRS_I/AAAAAAAARpE/a-aWqW4VesE4AKIoOdcp2sm8fQc4Ud0IACLcBGAs/s640/41.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Keep in mind whenever you see the color photo of Billy Lovelady above, that his is the movie that Raff* said conclusively proves that Billy Lovelady did not wear a red and white stripped, short sleeve shirt on the day of the assassination, except that the image is fake and isn't Billy Lovelady but actually stand-in used by the mysterious "they" but the mysterious "they" forgot to have his shirt unbuttoned and went back and added a white sliver to the fake image of a fake Lovelady. You got that?<br />
<br />
Also notice the following (you'll see why at the end of this section)... that the vertical white stripes above his pocket tend to fade out and the horizontal white and black stripes are very pronounced. Notice also, that the white and black stripes alternate top and bottom order. The bottom most set near the tail of the shirt show a dark black stripe under a white stripe. Just above is the next set with the black stripe now above the white stripe.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ttqM8CWHT6Q/WtyETt1IhFI/AAAAAAAARpQ/V7tfe4kBw-oMVC9fj0fWIUwLzG6gO7FDACLcBGAs/s1600/42.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="306" data-original-width="758" height="258" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ttqM8CWHT6Q/WtyETt1IhFI/AAAAAAAARpQ/V7tfe4kBw-oMVC9fj0fWIUwLzG6gO7FDACLcBGAs/s640/42.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Raff* can write for days and days about the exact same thing under the premise that the more he repeats something, the more true it becomes. Couple that with Raff*'s ability to make declaratory statements without offering any proof and you have the OIC Oswald-Lovelady-Doorman comparison in a nutshell.<br />
<br />
How unfortunate for Raff* that Oswald didn't put on his magical, hybrid shirt-jacket until after he went to his room at the boarding house and went to the picture show.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hYyxz7mNJbk/WtyG2VkHnII/AAAAAAAARpc/YWYVGLrKa5k9Y9Er6pt_9sJuXu4giTx2ACLcBGAs/s1600/43.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="180" data-original-width="747" height="154" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hYyxz7mNJbk/WtyG2VkHnII/AAAAAAAARpc/YWYVGLrKa5k9Y9Er6pt_9sJuXu4giTx2ACLcBGAs/s640/43.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Raff* Sink has been spouting the same bloviations above for over 6 years now and it stands as proof that Raff* has not grasped the idea that different film formats, different cameras, different perspectives will cause the same person or subject to appear different. He is too incompetent to understand the premise. Any difference he's seen, between 3 different sources of imagery, are automatically deemed fake. Well, that is except for the part he says is real. Here is a good example....<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_jvaxY0WiVs/WtyIweUyPpI/AAAAAAAARpo/_fj5ojnvFCsM1VIGqCB3vKehGTKc9kTcgCLcBGAs/s1600/44.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="528" data-original-width="749" height="451" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_jvaxY0WiVs/WtyIweUyPpI/AAAAAAAARpo/_fj5ojnvFCsM1VIGqCB3vKehGTKc9kTcgCLcBGAs/s640/44.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Point one....Raff* Sink is not a weight loss Doctor. Raff* Sink is a washed up Chiropractor that decided to call himself a weight loss Doctor and then joined with other non-weight loss Doctors to create a club and sanction themselves as weight loss Doctors. The State of Texas has had to remind Raff* that he's not a Doctor and to quit calling himself one.<br />
<br />
Point two....Raff* has offered no proof that the New Orleans Police dept. weighed Oswald. There is a weight listed on an arrest report and because weight is used to describe suspects, they asked suspects how much they weigh or estimate it.<br />
<br />
What Raff*'s seasoned eye fails to admit is, that in the photo on the right, the camera lens and distance from Oswald give the impression of a more lean and gaunt Oswald.<br />
<br />
Here is an example of what lens difference can do to make a subject look completely different....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uMTpZKPHLbk/WtyLIx6QAFI/AAAAAAAARp0/Zy7JU8eumccv8Ny8fJ3YE5Zc_Nj-7TXhQCLcBGAs/s1600/18kxy5bbtul32jpg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="675" data-original-width="1200" height="360" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uMTpZKPHLbk/WtyLIx6QAFI/AAAAAAAARp0/Zy7JU8eumccv8Ny8fJ3YE5Zc_Nj-7TXhQCLcBGAs/s640/18kxy5bbtul32jpg.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Now look again at Raff*'s selected photo and since he likes to make up juvenile nicknames for people that appear to be different, but they're actually the same, we'll call the Oswald on the left, Fat Elvis and on the right, Skinny Elvis.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ac27TIIyz9g/WtyLlBEyQLI/AAAAAAAARp8/Z5_XO9B0fA8Lwt4ZTXvWNihgZPh8_9KtwCLcBGAs/s1600/44a.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="276" data-original-width="602" height="292" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ac27TIIyz9g/WtyLlBEyQLI/AAAAAAAARp8/Z5_XO9B0fA8Lwt4ZTXvWNihgZPh8_9KtwCLcBGAs/s640/44a.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Look at Fat Elvis from August and then Skinny Elvis from November...then look at Skinny Elvis below....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-INRdW8sl4FM/WtyMOAl2B5I/AAAAAAAARqE/eAd0hHT6TucfXYxAX7VuwuTLa2OtKbtkgCLcBGAs/s1600/45.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1024" data-original-width="1014" height="640" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-INRdW8sl4FM/WtyMOAl2B5I/AAAAAAAARqE/eAd0hHT6TucfXYxAX7VuwuTLa2OtKbtkgCLcBGAs/s640/45.jpg" width="632" /></a></div>
<br />
He morphed back into Fat Elvis. Look at that neck as Raff* has been heard to exclaim. Now how could Fat Elvis be Skinny Elvis and just a few short hours before he was Skinny Elvis, he was Fat Elvis?<br />
<br />
Here is a crop from an article where the author showed the difference in the appearance of an subject, based on difference distances between the photographer and the subject....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/--C5_DkUxAJA/WtyNEgsrgnI/AAAAAAAARqM/HKyvYW7y1nkOEcaL1z-LaUwKW9a76TxcwCLcBGAs/s1600/46.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="538" data-original-width="686" height="313" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/--C5_DkUxAJA/WtyNEgsrgnI/AAAAAAAARqM/HKyvYW7y1nkOEcaL1z-LaUwKW9a76TxcwCLcBGAs/s400/46.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
The photographer took the photo on the left from 18 inches away. The one on the right, from 60 inches away. You can see the entire series of images shown on the card in the photos, here:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://petapixel.com/2012/07/17/why-the-camera-adds-10-pounds-seeing-ourselves-in-pictures/">Why the Camera Adds 10 Pounds</a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Raff*'s explanation for the Fat Elvis that you see above being fat just hours before becoming Skinny Elvis is that Fat Elvis is fake. But not the original Fat Elvis, just the Fat Elvis at the Dallas PD.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Raff* then ricochets back to the "perfect vee"...</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JkrV3rnpkdc/WtyPMoPDl6I/AAAAAAAARqY/7OAKbp88ADYepi6nbZhpIbRIvQBz9uUNACLcBGAs/s1600/47.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="525" data-original-width="750" height="448" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JkrV3rnpkdc/WtyPMoPDl6I/AAAAAAAARqY/7OAKbp88ADYepi6nbZhpIbRIvQBz9uUNACLcBGAs/s640/47.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
We've already covered the remarks of one Anthony Bothello. Now let's jump into the make believe world of one, Richard Hooke, ex-refrigerator art expert of the OIC. Raff* and his merry band of clowns rely heavily on the collages of Richard. James H. Fetzer, PhD, has touted Richard's works of art all over the place, from his blog page to his various radio shows, to the pages of Veterans Today(until Fetzer was banned and his works removed) to the Education Forum. You will see several links to various discussions at the Education Forum concerning the repeated attempts of the OIC to convince the JFK world that they are right.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Richard has a tendency to contradict himself in his little works of art. Notice that in the two photos of Oswald, there is no perfect vee in the neck of his t-shirt. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Now let's look at a blowup of Richard's collage....</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b_Yawhym4wc/WtyT_n_NzaI/AAAAAAAARqo/a-zqKKC35qAqy-uzfOsusGbIQzNPRqTIgCLcBGAs/s1600/47a.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="418" data-original-width="452" height="295" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b_Yawhym4wc/WtyT_n_NzaI/AAAAAAAARqo/a-zqKKC35qAqy-uzfOsusGbIQzNPRqTIgCLcBGAs/s320/47a.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
As you will see, when the OIC talks perfect vee, they use a particular copy of the Altgens 6 crop. Whe Richard goes in for detail, you actually see where he's bullshitting you.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0e0hZWEPk5k/WtyUZciWGnI/AAAAAAAARqw/cEXk3iHYEhgBMIBYmmH0MOB1dhDmEHfVQCLcBGAs/s1600/48.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="160" data-original-width="748" height="136" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0e0hZWEPk5k/WtyUZciWGnI/AAAAAAAARqw/cEXk3iHYEhgBMIBYmmH0MOB1dhDmEHfVQCLcBGAs/s640/48.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The rear reducing, ever morphing, frontal prominent sometimes but mostly middle of the road, perfect vee.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
As a reminder, the rear reduced perfect vee....</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2uCBpIWR3PI/WtyWH4MBgaI/AAAAAAAARq8/_uU3xiJtDjgih4ZyROY1P2OjyxKhi01PgCLcBGAs/s1600/u1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="247" data-original-width="482" height="163" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2uCBpIWR3PI/WtyWH4MBgaI/AAAAAAAARq8/_uU3xiJtDjgih4ZyROY1P2OjyxKhi01PgCLcBGAs/s320/u1.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zwVcRIU_yzs/WtyWXx-H74I/AAAAAAAARrE/4dQb2kd9FVouZZtTmS5dzCzYYjm-uhRVwCLcBGAs/s1600/u2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="248" data-original-width="480" height="165" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zwVcRIU_yzs/WtyWXx-H74I/AAAAAAAARrE/4dQb2kd9FVouZZtTmS5dzCzYYjm-uhRVwCLcBGAs/s320/u2.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2ogqwFHszU8/WtyhcBoxiWI/AAAAAAAARrY/MA2AToMwsRwh7ZPDYE_hsbiMA3g-93XJgCLcBGAs/s1600/49.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="541" data-original-width="788" height="438" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2ogqwFHszU8/WtyhcBoxiWI/AAAAAAAARrY/MA2AToMwsRwh7ZPDYE_hsbiMA3g-93XJgCLcBGAs/s640/49.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
There are a couple of things that Richard doesn't explain. First, he shows the supposed neckline of Doorman and it doesn't match the one shown for Oswald. The "vertex" shown by Richard on Oswald is an edge to the neck of the shirt but on "Doorman" it's a curving blob of shadow.<br />
<br />
Another thing he can't explain is how this photo taken seconds from his "Doorman" image shows a normal crew neck t-shirt with no vee, "vortex" or anything else...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PuXQ6nIzfSM/WtykHRaoJrI/AAAAAAAARrk/N08y6eET4N0xOCaZx-qOwaWr2XkzWEP2wCLcBGAs/s1600/wiegmancrop2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="318" data-original-width="310" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PuXQ6nIzfSM/WtykHRaoJrI/AAAAAAAARrk/N08y6eET4N0xOCaZx-qOwaWr2XkzWEP2wCLcBGAs/s1600/wiegmancrop2.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
Richard is like Raff*...he never lets the facts get in the way of good refrigerator art.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIHQgreHcY0Juw404jJaYFeONBllYMr0x9Pt5cC6xpowsw9H8KEyK9qAElFEuQMIguuYSKgBg0mYRmytRHdQ8JjWgrcgMXLBzTy2TBpJ3kYhzasFQjgPCYlmCd1yfaL1UL_zKgKvp6942u/s1600/50.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="314" data-original-width="759" height="264" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIHQgreHcY0Juw404jJaYFeONBllYMr0x9Pt5cC6xpowsw9H8KEyK9qAElFEuQMIguuYSKgBg0mYRmytRHdQ8JjWgrcgMXLBzTy2TBpJ3kYhzasFQjgPCYlmCd1yfaL1UL_zKgKvp6942u/s640/50.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
If? If Doorman was wearing a v-shaped t-shirt? I thought this was the smoking gun of the JFK world? I thought it was definitive. Conclusive. Next, Raff* declares that there is no such thing as a perfectly vee shaped shadow anywhere in the world. "Keep in mind that no one has ever brought forth an image in which a round t-shirt was made to look perfectly vee-shaped due to chin shadow". Except the OIC. Just look above at any use of the crop of Altgens 6 and compare it to Wiegman's crop.<br />
We'll see another example by Raff* in a bit....<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EzjPkWcN--E/WtymeTcyfgI/AAAAAAAARsI/GQFUx2axO0IvOQXdUUUpzhmIzuETHngvwCLcBGAs/s1600/51.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="397" data-original-width="769" height="330" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EzjPkWcN--E/WtymeTcyfgI/AAAAAAAARsI/GQFUx2axO0IvOQXdUUUpzhmIzuETHngvwCLcBGAs/s640/51.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
In this collage, I'll zoom in on a particular finding by Richard....<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BZ4Ip0qJ7nU/WtynkHLU5PI/AAAAAAAARsQ/CxxiWRhdMkkaTZ8k2Xyw_K7ZlVphG2bwgCLcBGAs/s1600/51a.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="521" data-original-width="735" height="452" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BZ4Ip0qJ7nU/WtynkHLU5PI/AAAAAAAARsQ/CxxiWRhdMkkaTZ8k2Xyw_K7ZlVphG2bwgCLcBGAs/s640/51a.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
See the little box on both the Altgens crop and Oswald on the far right. While Oswald's t-shirt was manifesting, his hair was growing as well. On the right, Oswald's hair on his left temple, which lays no further forward than his side burn suddenly grows on the left, to a length past the outside of his left eye, wrapping around his forehead. So not only do we have to deal with an always moving manifesting vee but also the Magic Hair Barbie effect. It was so bad that the mysterious "they" had to keep Lovelady in hiding for the next 16 years. My guess is it was to keep Oswald's family from suing the Mattel Toy company for patent infringement when the Magic Hair Barbie came out. I'm sure they can use Richard's collage as evidence.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wSmnSH3dbQo/WtypoUCfbRI/AAAAAAAARsc/lF2QpPCkqj4Gcslgu5ef8XlNKH4JmAfIQCLcBGAs/s1600/52.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="580" data-original-width="741" height="500" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wSmnSH3dbQo/WtypoUCfbRI/AAAAAAAARsc/lF2QpPCkqj4Gcslgu5ef8XlNKH4JmAfIQCLcBGAs/s640/52.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Now the little spiel that Raff* gives about the film being high contrast comes from someone schooling his ass in the past about black and white photography and Altgens' use of Tri-X film. He doesn't know squat about photography. Did you also notice that the Altgens crop used by Raff* is different from others. It's smaller and at a higher contrast than what is used in Richard's collages that show an irregular edge to the neck of the shirt. Just scroll back and see for yourself.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHXydCL1lrWpCbgaHlnJOQocMKApW9pYw0evdVyvvHnyVHQ09Ws9T-zJdx73OQlTyZ4fX8cIJGWtHYB3t9PmyB2-sXTwc9QPXdfoKvK_58_Ej3yvz-Zx_U8k-lfioANz3dksR_Hm3NflLj/s1600/53.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="642" data-original-width="749" height="548" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHXydCL1lrWpCbgaHlnJOQocMKApW9pYw0evdVyvvHnyVHQ09Ws9T-zJdx73OQlTyZ4fX8cIJGWtHYB3t9PmyB2-sXTwc9QPXdfoKvK_58_Ej3yvz-Zx_U8k-lfioANz3dksR_Hm3NflLj/s640/53.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
The photo above is from Raff*'s disastrous attempt to replicate the Altgens 6 photo. In that attempt, Raff* hired a "professional" photographer to take a different camera, and stand in a different place, and take various digital photos, and pass them off as legitimate examples of Altgens' famous photo. He and James H. Fetzer, PhD have published a description of this half-assed effort on various websites and in several forums.<br />
<br />
Here's an example....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Jx71PguccGQ/Wtyu8CtEetI/AAAAAAAARsw/P2qAu0DyXvoCk1O67AV21IzS-m-Pvjz8ACLcBGAs/s1600/54.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="618" data-original-width="881" height="448" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Jx71PguccGQ/Wtyu8CtEetI/AAAAAAAARsw/P2qAu0DyXvoCk1O67AV21IzS-m-Pvjz8ACLcBGAs/s640/54.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19722-jfk-believe-it-or-not-oswald-wasnt-even-a-shooter/?page=2">http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19722-jfk-believe-it-or-not-oswald-wasnt-even-a-shooter/?page=2</a><br />
<br />
The Lamson being criticized by Raff* pointed out to Raff* later, that the photographer using the flash was not recreating Altgens...Raff* got pissed (American definition, not British). Lamson did give an example of just how bad Raff*'s super experiment failed from git go.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-T94-f_JRJcM/WtyxDGVpRRI/AAAAAAAARs8/xyx1AGUeR3wN_mutDsLieJxTmAjOqrkSgCLcBGAs/s1600/55.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="443" data-original-width="907" height="310" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-T94-f_JRJcM/WtyxDGVpRRI/AAAAAAAARs8/xyx1AGUeR3wN_mutDsLieJxTmAjOqrkSgCLcBGAs/s640/55.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Proof that Raff*'s photographer wasn't standing anywhere near Altgens' position. But here's how Raff* described it....<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n5O5QPyj_Xk/Wty1wxclb0I/AAAAAAAARtY/UD7rVndcmsE3MfjYiJMI6BT3391nOYA6ACLcBGAs/s1600/ralphopeningquote.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="336" data-original-width="657" height="326" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n5O5QPyj_Xk/Wty1wxclb0I/AAAAAAAARtY/UD7rVndcmsE3MfjYiJMI6BT3391nOYA6ACLcBGAs/s640/ralphopeningquote.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
You can read the entire article and discussion here: <a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19720-jfk-49-years-in-the-offing-the-altgens-reenactment/">http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/19720-jfk-49-years-in-the-offing-the-altgens-reenactment/</a><br />
<br />
Raff*, starts his narration and then gets into discussing his photos and the first one he offers is this...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8n1EKquJ960/Wty5YlNfPXI/AAAAAAAARtk/5oIg_JZoIEIE-m3GdJbtx6DxlNARer5pACLcBGAs/s1600/quotecrev.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="490" data-original-width="672" height="466" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8n1EKquJ960/Wty5YlNfPXI/AAAAAAAARtk/5oIg_JZoIEIE-m3GdJbtx6DxlNARer5pACLcBGAs/s640/quotecrev.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff*'s professional photo reenactment starts off with a digital shot taken from a completely different location than that of here....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bUU-AWvOeH8/Wty6hBaayII/AAAAAAAARts/9nIvVJXncUg6CkTm25azbCvtqkHOWs89wCLcBGAs/s1600/55b.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="207" data-original-width="305" height="434" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bUU-AWvOeH8/Wty6hBaayII/AAAAAAAARts/9nIvVJXncUg6CkTm25azbCvtqkHOWs89wCLcBGAs/s640/55b.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Now keep in mind that this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cLn1s-Pcf-A/Wty7fTnLIaI/AAAAAAAARt0/azDCJ-DwPloC9Am4ucQ7hO2_DvT4HTNNQCLcBGAs/s1600/55c.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="335" data-original-width="240" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cLn1s-Pcf-A/Wty7fTnLIaI/AAAAAAAARt0/azDCJ-DwPloC9Am4ucQ7hO2_DvT4HTNNQCLcBGAs/s320/55c.JPG" width="229" /></a></div>
Is an enlargement of this....</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Quy91eGXJ9w/Wty7oA7La5I/AAAAAAAARt4/iSFVUVND41QvIcQypZjeGx6FltTKCatfACLcBGAs/s1600/A1%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="134" data-original-width="150" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Quy91eGXJ9w/Wty7oA7La5I/AAAAAAAARt4/iSFVUVND41QvIcQypZjeGx6FltTKCatfACLcBGAs/s1600/A1%25281%2529.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">actual size</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uqv00MXhSiQ/Wty9TVEljvI/AAAAAAAARuI/NX8ADIQEqeItRYHguXhjNHcZSwNv7rqwACLcBGAs/s1600/55e.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="414" data-original-width="610" height="434" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uqv00MXhSiQ/Wty9TVEljvI/AAAAAAAARuI/NX8ADIQEqeItRYHguXhjNHcZSwNv7rqwACLcBGAs/s640/55e.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
Did you notice the chin shadow? Not of Raff* On his stand in....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-y-C0aevjjGo/Wty97ICnPfI/AAAAAAAARuQ/fYrbA0xMXv8Fn_Q_l5vfAUjtrGYFJwoKwCLcBGAs/s1600/55d%2B-%2BCopy.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="357" data-original-width="260" height="640" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-y-C0aevjjGo/Wty97ICnPfI/AAAAAAAARuQ/fYrbA0xMXv8Fn_Q_l5vfAUjtrGYFJwoKwCLcBGAs/s640/55d%2B-%2BCopy.JPG" width="466" /></a></div>
Those never happen in real life....<br />
<br />
Raff* shows a variety of digital, color digital converted to black and white and what he claims is Tri-X 35mm black and white photos in his article. He blows his entire perfect vee comparison with the first closeup he uses.<br />
<br />
Raff* is such a dumbass....<br />
<br />
Here's another of his photos....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjut7hDK1bT_JbNtWVdpO1ZXrqLJXOLaCyxVMB6dsH5H7FN1vvIqXCTNsZcBt6j8jvhYKboWoMi6WyM6daXvS3j-kl5rHK0JxVSrNEDiWLNjzj6TcWsD9iQ4sP3I_rbVbWd2yJY0jejyt4/s1600/quoteg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="777" data-original-width="665" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjut7hDK1bT_JbNtWVdpO1ZXrqLJXOLaCyxVMB6dsH5H7FN1vvIqXCTNsZcBt6j8jvhYKboWoMi6WyM6daXvS3j-kl5rHK0JxVSrNEDiWLNjzj6TcWsD9iQ4sP3I_rbVbWd2yJY0jejyt4/s640/quoteg.jpg" width="546" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* was wearing a v-shaped t-shirt but look at what happened.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hcsvT_TgP5Y/WtzCyMsO-aI/AAAAAAAARu0/mtW_YieaL38hd5L6mDG_m3Z8xDuGlO87QCLcBGAs/s1600/quoteg1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="438" data-original-width="434" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hcsvT_TgP5Y/WtzCyMsO-aI/AAAAAAAARu0/mtW_YieaL38hd5L6mDG_m3Z8xDuGlO87QCLcBGAs/s1600/quoteg1.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Major fail dos.....<br />
<br />
And here is one he refuses to post.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2DppvbXt3qjAqE2CU6sotpfsKnOdSWmBfI2F9nDH94c0jy-YK7Ltbb3hoprC_ElM4x0nH0C441O77IJoERlZIX54TJd3AEjf0kPpnIBh8PGZi8jP-sNHMTRg7UkIt6o2M-9TANlv7_Vqa/s1600/vshadowrev11.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="213" data-original-width="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2DppvbXt3qjAqE2CU6sotpfsKnOdSWmBfI2F9nDH94c0jy-YK7Ltbb3hoprC_ElM4x0nH0C441O77IJoERlZIX54TJd3AEjf0kPpnIBh8PGZi8jP-sNHMTRg7UkIt6o2M-9TANlv7_Vqa/s1600/vshadowrev11.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
That's Raff*'s crew neck t-shirt. Looks a little...ummmm....veeish doesn't it? </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgds_8a2nLLQp_YoYBVMplF205q9wwBHJWw6tBRlySEdBqOazFB-Xesr44_Jxo9Q5-xssUXFTwPyaaD_ZjCCYUwfD4Urqy0Qgo8Mf1mplFFGFNzluythWqADZPT4JyiVJdGqdBYPpY4TrAP/s1600/vshadowrev112.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="254" data-original-width="189" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgds_8a2nLLQp_YoYBVMplF205q9wwBHJWw6tBRlySEdBqOazFB-Xesr44_Jxo9Q5-xssUXFTwPyaaD_ZjCCYUwfD4Urqy0Qgo8Mf1mplFFGFNzluythWqADZPT4JyiVJdGqdBYPpY4TrAP/s400/vshadowrev112.jpg" width="297" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />He's such a tool...<br />
<br />
But getting back to the OIC site...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U2pXst3xkMg/WtzE_9Vcn_I/AAAAAAAARvM/R7nvgvdfkwoSV-_Qr8nbfyukrnG27cBLgCLcBGAs/s1600/59.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="599" data-original-width="788" height="486" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-U2pXst3xkMg/WtzE_9Vcn_I/AAAAAAAARvM/R7nvgvdfkwoSV-_Qr8nbfyukrnG27cBLgCLcBGAs/s640/59.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
This has to be one of the funniest things I have ever seen regarding the Altgens photo. Richard Hooke is demonstrating where a series of minute folds, each one showing as a line in Oswald's photo measuring less than a 16th of an inch wide<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_5RvLOljuEM/WtzHQIltMlI/AAAAAAAARvg/r2EvasuOsN0EGHwDxIlbiUk3u6YbyrAqgCLcBGAs/s1600/59a.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="293" data-original-width="259" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_5RvLOljuEM/WtzHQIltMlI/AAAAAAAARvg/r2EvasuOsN0EGHwDxIlbiUk3u6YbyrAqgCLcBGAs/s1600/59a.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
shows up in this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XmMp_ezBUYk/WtzFljsiCOI/AAAAAAAARvU/yORPcfsXEDYaatAyYdvUzn6cFXKA6FPdgCLcBGAs/s1600/A1%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="134" data-original-width="150" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XmMp_ezBUYk/WtzFljsiCOI/AAAAAAAARvU/yORPcfsXEDYaatAyYdvUzn6cFXKA6FPdgCLcBGAs/s1600/A1%25281%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
The grain in the film is larger than the fucking crinkle.<br />
<br />
Raff* continues...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6zvJUCI2IWs/WtzHhmgvWRI/AAAAAAAARvo/MO-XPSYYwQYusjY9LC_WaV_o6gBxLtMUACLcBGAs/s1600/60.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="527" data-original-width="751" height="448" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6zvJUCI2IWs/WtzHhmgvWRI/AAAAAAAARvo/MO-XPSYYwQYusjY9LC_WaV_o6gBxLtMUACLcBGAs/s640/60.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EMuwStTQC3o/WtzIZ0gNH-I/AAAAAAAARvw/h3D7ijl2Ob0snlVHQtNqidDotvQm58mxgCLcBGAs/s1600/60a.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="410" data-original-width="652" height="402" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EMuwStTQC3o/WtzIZ0gNH-I/AAAAAAAARvw/h3D7ijl2Ob0snlVHQtNqidDotvQm58mxgCLcBGAs/s640/60a.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Let's try this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xI8y6zZ0p3Q/WtzJynwLkdI/AAAAAAAARv8/MlsYnsRzr3QuqDoP6awmU9qzGXIcXU07ACLcBGAs/s1600/60c.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="410" data-original-width="652" height="251" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xI8y6zZ0p3Q/WtzJynwLkdI/AAAAAAAARv8/MlsYnsRzr3QuqDoP6awmU9qzGXIcXU07ACLcBGAs/s400/60c.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Lobe for lobe, Raff*'s an idiot.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uchCRAZ3L0M/WtzKCoyebMI/AAAAAAAARwE/MWuqNbyoifI3ULN9-pJ-IK1wGEcqpszAgCLcBGAs/s1600/61.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="453" data-original-width="681" height="424" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uchCRAZ3L0M/WtzKCoyebMI/AAAAAAAARwE/MWuqNbyoifI3ULN9-pJ-IK1wGEcqpszAgCLcBGAs/s640/61.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Richard is as well.<br />
<br />
That last one was almost as good as the crinkle.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YkrhunF5S88/WtzKeNgoUPI/AAAAAAAARwM/oXPhE2aKNskOSkwGPtCS_eVIAyo2csbBACLcBGAs/s1600/62.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="454" data-original-width="748" height="388" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YkrhunF5S88/WtzKeNgoUPI/AAAAAAAARwM/oXPhE2aKNskOSkwGPtCS_eVIAyo2csbBACLcBGAs/s640/62.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Yup...Lovelady's tapers in and Oswald's gets wider...another smoking gun....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GDLWpx0gMRE/WtzKyRz4inI/AAAAAAAARwU/PbVAingmrJkODWa8cH2VmnB_V4PsWTDWgCLcBGAs/s1600/63.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="233" data-original-width="756" height="196" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GDLWpx0gMRE/WtzKyRz4inI/AAAAAAAARwU/PbVAingmrJkODWa8cH2VmnB_V4PsWTDWgCLcBGAs/s640/63.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
We're done with funny charts by Richard....except this one that was removed from the OIC page....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yseFIAVXQTw/WtzLX-vrLSI/AAAAAAAARwg/gwrQL5bXfeUTBMsT9jCOoqREFBYS9WS0gCLcBGAs/s1600/remove1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="698" data-original-width="683" height="400" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yseFIAVXQTw/WtzLX-vrLSI/AAAAAAAARwg/gwrQL5bXfeUTBMsT9jCOoqREFBYS9WS0gCLcBGAs/s400/remove1.JPG" width="391" /></a></div>
<br />
That one was actually laughed off of the OIC page due to widespread ridicule.<br />
<br />
Raff* goes on to claim that Oswald had "postural" habits that included clasping his wrist with the other hand and pursing his lips but unfortunately, the OIC can't produce a single photo of Oswald clasping his wrist with his other hand that wasn't taken while he was in handcuffs and for one instance when he wasn't allowed to put his hands in his pockets, being out of them.<br />
<br />
Here's a picture of Oswald cheering his postural habits...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Dxnx3rmm4s0/WtzVM5MupDI/AAAAAAAARxA/ALJqPwb1LooWY77JgUwM2BwK61tAEWNwgCLcBGAs/s1600/yeah.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="226" data-original-width="223" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Dxnx3rmm4s0/WtzVM5MupDI/AAAAAAAARxA/ALJqPwb1LooWY77JgUwM2BwK61tAEWNwgCLcBGAs/s1600/yeah.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
And here is Oswald pursing his lips and holding his wrist all over Russia...</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hgp2qPv4cUo/WtzVeAvp7KI/AAAAAAAARxI/ukRtVNei_tccxgSmh43MK3eY9jSpfFjjQCLcBGAs/s1600/LHO24.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="541" data-original-width="588" height="367" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hgp2qPv4cUo/WtzVeAvp7KI/AAAAAAAARxI/ukRtVNei_tccxgSmh43MK3eY9jSpfFjjQCLcBGAs/s400/LHO24.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
Here's Oswald holding his wrist as a teenager...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgs6LhpQlmz9qMeeiP3lVn_e7Dp8szVd3LbRW-OI_2Dc31ls4jqIug7xuDD17TrHHsyLY2i71loztLCUSHgC-Cego9R4ZnVhUTyfLwuL3tF_NG6TbJxHG1Al7UxreLA647Xo88VP1wKaDWj/s1600/wrist.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="332" data-original-width="234" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgs6LhpQlmz9qMeeiP3lVn_e7Dp8szVd3LbRW-OI_2Dc31ls4jqIug7xuDD17TrHHsyLY2i71loztLCUSHgC-Cego9R4ZnVhUTyfLwuL3tF_NG6TbJxHG1Al7UxreLA647Xo88VP1wKaDWj/s320/wrist.jpg" width="225" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br />
And here is proof that Oswald started thumb tugging his shirts at an early stage...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oRAvEFOP4SI/WtzYWPLlYjI/AAAAAAAARxg/9hCpPimKv9g4zCvGbh9uVPzPcJHwC5qbACLcBGAs/s1600/tugger.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="210" data-original-width="556" height="150" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oRAvEFOP4SI/WtzYWPLlYjI/AAAAAAAARxg/9hCpPimKv9g4zCvGbh9uVPzPcJHwC5qbACLcBGAs/s400/tugger.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Next.....all the reasons that Billy Lovelady cannot be Billy Lovelady.....<br />
<br /></div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-85765959609797428822018-04-15T21:32:00.000+01:002018-04-15T21:32:20.561+01:00Series Note 4It seems as though every post in the Founded In Fetzering series is causing Raff* Sink to have to alter his website. He says it's to bolster an already airtight case but think about that for a moment....If it was so airtight, why all the clarifications and additions?<br />
<br />
Here's just the overnight examples....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xnoemJRQ_AY/WtO2ZEAxdGI/AAAAAAAARoc/_IRFpTorOZYhudFjvOS81ti0R05IQkuSwCLcBGAs/s1600/mod5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="677" data-original-width="470" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xnoemJRQ_AY/WtO2ZEAxdGI/AAAAAAAARoc/_IRFpTorOZYhudFjvOS81ti0R05IQkuSwCLcBGAs/s1600/mod5.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* speaks of rats from experience....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qy1TRQHCdwY/WtO2kp5D75I/AAAAAAAARog/GAJw_-F1oBYoOvxFRkyqMsOhC7uZuzHtACLcBGAs/s1600/rafftherat.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="397" data-original-width="397" height="400" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qy1TRQHCdwY/WtO2kp5D75I/AAAAAAAARog/GAJw_-F1oBYoOvxFRkyqMsOhC7uZuzHtACLcBGAs/s400/rafftherat.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-90469726237327891792018-04-15T02:24:00.000+01:002018-04-15T02:24:44.495+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 7aNext, I will go through the two pages on the OIC website that cover Oswald and Lovelady. I am combining the two pages because the OIC refers to one in the other and because the information contained in the two is redundant in many respects.<br />
<br />
Throughout these two pages, Raff* Sink consistently shows his selective process or "cherry picking" of statements, comments and reports when arriving at his erroneous conclusions. I will also try to insert examples of Raff* contradicting himself over the years as he has had to backtrack on several items of contention.<br />
<br />
This part 7 will be continued in several posts.<br />
<br />
Let's begin...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-antfJ0ZLK5s/WtH5qgDam7I/AAAAAAAARkQ/fLZ67dAc85AwSwsII2ZeTYN_pMMBLevmQCLcBGAs/s1600/30.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="131" data-original-width="747" height="112" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-antfJ0ZLK5s/WtH5qgDam7I/AAAAAAAARkQ/fLZ67dAc85AwSwsII2ZeTYN_pMMBLevmQCLcBGAs/s640/30.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AEa69V5fhcw/WtH7srYz_mI/AAAAAAAARkc/wCTrRlaTNpcrzj2kp8iypgY4YJlvPvswQCLcBGAs/s1600/tint3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="370" data-original-width="652" height="363" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AEa69V5fhcw/WtH7srYz_mI/AAAAAAAARkc/wCTrRlaTNpcrzj2kp8iypgY4YJlvPvswQCLcBGAs/s640/tint3.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
The overlay in the OIC page is a GIF file that shows the image on the right slowly fading into view. Larry Rivera did an entire "scientific paper" on the methods used to produce the image on the right. In his "scientific" process, he admits that he took a copy of the Altgens 6 photo and enlarged it to get the image on the left. As you can see, the image has been enlarged to the point of wiping out much of the detail. You can also see the beginnings of squares that are a result of the pixelation process on computer monitors.<br />
<br />
Here is an example that we will see later in the discussion of Raff*'s famous Lovelady's arrow...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GYJDphAOW-s/WtH-R1wAizI/AAAAAAAARko/whQT-Zo_RbwAcjQY2jQWduKjJo_pSGHlgCLcBGAs/s1600/linedrawn5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="314" data-original-width="290" height="200" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GYJDphAOW-s/WtH-R1wAizI/AAAAAAAARko/whQT-Zo_RbwAcjQY2jQWduKjJo_pSGHlgCLcBGAs/s200/linedrawn5.jpg" width="184" /></a></div>
<br />
Larry Rivera also revealed that the image of Oswald used in his fade-in GIF was altered, flipped and tinted to achieve the desired effect. We all know that altering, flipping and tinting photos to reach a desired outcome is accepted by all as a part of the "scientific method"<insert eye roll here>.<br />
<br />
Rivera used two programs to achieve his desired effect...Photo Shop and some other screen capture program. You can do the same thing with Corel's Paintshop by creating layers and then using Snag It to take a screen shot of the photo at different opaqueness levels and the using Windows Movie maker to join each individual shot into a GIF movie.<br />
<br />
What Raff* describes as the "most advanced image analysis that has ever been done" is nothing more than a photo trick that can be accomplished by anyone with the patience to produce a series of screen captures and make a movie.<br />
<br />
So let's move on...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EIMgjsGinW4/WtIAs-mpAKI/AAAAAAAARk0/ukyYmcYYrKQTHCVGwAD_M9savr887t5lQCLcBGAs/s1600/31.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="133" data-original-width="744" height="114" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EIMgjsGinW4/WtIAs-mpAKI/AAAAAAAARk0/ukyYmcYYrKQTHCVGwAD_M9savr887t5lQCLcBGAs/s640/31.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
If thinking that the general likeness of Oswald and Billy Lovelady in Altgens 6 is "truly breathtaking", then you'll really be amazed when you see how much Billy Lovelady looks like Billy Lovelady in Altgens 6.<br />
<br />
Notice that Raff* says that "skillful efforts were applied to alter Doorman's facial features" and then clarifies it by saying "and really just the top of his head and his hairline". This is because the OIC has had to constantly backtrack on claims about "facial alterations" and what you are reading is the end result of infighting among OIC members due to Raff* being at odds with Fetzer and former OIC member Richard Hooke as to the extent of facial features being altered by the mysterious "they".<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DsFciIh2jXM/WtICtPBMpcI/AAAAAAAARlA/PmDXfDDssmkVPQT3HluJv8pGjt6p6KgrgCLcBGAs/s1600/32.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="634" data-original-width="552" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DsFciIh2jXM/WtICtPBMpcI/AAAAAAAARlA/PmDXfDDssmkVPQT3HluJv8pGjt6p6KgrgCLcBGAs/s320/32.JPG" width="278" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CEuboPLk80g/WtICy9pZPKI/AAAAAAAARlE/XavbAHJfKYILSIN8G__HZLIbXNdewqafQCLcBGAs/s1600/33.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="353" data-original-width="747" height="302" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-CEuboPLk80g/WtICy9pZPKI/AAAAAAAARlE/XavbAHJfKYILSIN8G__HZLIbXNdewqafQCLcBGAs/s640/33.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* comes out of the gate with an out and out lie. Billy Lovelady didn't not claim for "months" to have worn a short sleeved shirt with red and white stripes. He did not go to the FBI and show them that shirt. As we will see, the FBI attributed to Lovelady the claim of wearing a short sleeved shirt with red and white stripes on the day of the assassination and as we saw with the statements of Carolyn Arnold (See Founded In Fetzering Part 1) the FBI had a bad habit of attributing statements to people that never made them. Billy Lovelady identified himself in the Altgens 6 photo when questioned by the FBI, the day of the assassination<br />
<br />
So, we have noticed that Oswald and the OIC "Doorman" wore long sleeves and had a partially unbuttoned shirt. Then Raff* asks the question "is there any evidence that Billy Lovelady wore his shirt that day, also unbuttoned"? The answer is yes, but Raff* doesn't tell you that. When confronted with the evidence that Lovelady's shirt was worn partially unbuttoned, Raff* claimed that the evidence was faked.<br />
<br />
Here is where Raff* admits that he was made aware that Lovelady didn't wear a short sleeved, red and white stripped shirt on the day of the assassination...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-nqsld8JKAPQ/WtKEcB1nHTI/AAAAAAAARlY/OKvivkuvc3wbV9P0vwUuJAUQODBZW0eBgCLcBGAs/s1600/aa3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="286" data-original-width="643" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-nqsld8JKAPQ/WtKEcB1nHTI/AAAAAAAARlY/OKvivkuvc3wbV9P0vwUuJAUQODBZW0eBgCLcBGAs/s1600/aa3.JPG" /></a></div>
Here is a screen cap of that video...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Gcq1dXf7NyM/WtKHgzCUMpI/AAAAAAAARlk/qyYnFahmu102ut3X4l8zfqjGc1txPiUQQCLcBGAs/s1600/loveladytsbdcap.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="472" data-original-width="652" height="462" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Gcq1dXf7NyM/WtKHgzCUMpI/AAAAAAAARlk/qyYnFahmu102ut3X4l8zfqjGc1txPiUQQCLcBGAs/s640/loveladytsbdcap.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
When Raff* realized that he just admitted that all of his bullshit was bullshit....he changed his tune and played the "fake" card. You'll see that in a bit.<br />
<br />
It makes no difference that the Warren Commission ever asked Billy Lovelady about how he wore his shirt because he was directly asked about being in the Altgens 6 photo and he showed them where he was in the photo while testifying. Raff* then twists the facts again we he states that Lovelady certainly would have been in the position to contradict some of the HSCA's findings because Lovelady was interviewed by the HSCA prior to his unexpected heart attack. Lovelady stated in a taped interview that the FBI was waiting for him when he and his wife arrived home the night of the assassination about 6:00 pm and showed him a blow up of the Altgens 6 photo and he identified himself as the man in the doorway.<br />
<br />
Another huge omission by Raff* Sink is that the shirt worn by Oswald when he was arrested, was not worn by Oswald at the TSBD. Now, Raff* is going to claim that "even the Warren Commission came to the conclusion that Oswald's arrest shirt was the same" but the Warren Commission also came to the conclusion that Oswald shot Kennedy so..... if we are to believe the Warren Commission......<br />
<br />
Raff* continues....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwfBRoxkc24o_a32Ndrl8xzLDslPqz5QDPKt0T0fBfbpFqPvUBbzXf8eh9A470_YcDR9f1jJnWlKdqqFhbvlLl1u6OZs17wjPg6DjDR5Yx87LmLS22qh0mx55RtQM7SBiwf4hvkTnf3FRx/s1600/34.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="448" data-original-width="689" height="416" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwfBRoxkc24o_a32Ndrl8xzLDslPqz5QDPKt0T0fBfbpFqPvUBbzXf8eh9A470_YcDR9f1jJnWlKdqqFhbvlLl1u6OZs17wjPg6DjDR5Yx87LmLS22qh0mx55RtQM7SBiwf4hvkTnf3FRx/s640/34.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Actually, it was not "sunken" into a crude vee on either of them. Raff* Sink and former OIC member Richard Hooke have tried to pass a stretched neck on Oswald's t-shirt as a "thumb tugged" vee for years. There is not a single member of the OIC that can produce a photo of Lee Oswald in a vee necked t-shirt, "thumb tugged" or otherwise. They can only produce pictures of Oswald with a stretched t-shirt after his arrest. When Lee Oswald was arrested, his t-shirt was stretched to the point it was almost coming off his shoulders. Raff* and Richard both know this and the only evidence for their claim is a comment made by one Anthony Bothello that stated he recognized Oswald in Altgens 6 because Oswald would use his thumb to tug and stretch the neck of his t-shirts to make them more comfortable. Strange that in all of the interviews given to the FBI by Bothello, he never mentioned that "fact".<br />
<br />
Here is Oswald being marched out of the Texas Theater. The cop in the helmet behind Oswald is holding Oswald by the back of his shirt....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bKN3doBFuus/WtKRt-dVjDI/AAAAAAAARmA/WxVWR2sEW8kU80MKmqh0pn3Eu8Qp4zhwQCLcBGAs/s1600/GeraldHill-B.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="356" data-original-width="539" height="422" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bKN3doBFuus/WtKRt-dVjDI/AAAAAAAARmA/WxVWR2sEW8kU80MKmqh0pn3Eu8Qp4zhwQCLcBGAs/s640/GeraldHill-B.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
And here is Oswald entering the DPD....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oyT3kRvsZY0/WtKSLA_3GxI/AAAAAAAARmE/rukr5T7o5EQlGmOnbbPg-AoXrd8gICKTACLcBGAs/s1600/4days1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="496" data-original-width="733" height="432" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oyT3kRvsZY0/WtKSLA_3GxI/AAAAAAAARmE/rukr5T7o5EQlGmOnbbPg-AoXrd8gICKTACLcBGAs/s640/4days1.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
You can see how stretched his T-shirt is<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-a1bpGPbgDKk/WtKWNTLO2eI/AAAAAAAARmU/0ECejBpc4V09HDdmytllk3ESQSvxMZWhACLcBGAs/s1600/35.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="138" data-original-width="748" height="118" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-a1bpGPbgDKk/WtKWNTLO2eI/AAAAAAAARmU/0ECejBpc4V09HDdmytllk3ESQSvxMZWhACLcBGAs/s640/35.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Raff* spend an inordinate amount of time making obtuse statements and asking obtuse questions to avoid the obvious. He has to. It's the only way he can weave a narrative to support his claims. The Dallas Police didn't need to ask Billy Lovelady whether his shirt was sprawled open because he was siting right in front of them with his shirt sprawled open.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ev2cumewFbM/WtKaMWU9BUI/AAAAAAAARmg/56630MiBy0cG-Eha1Fm6OABDb4f2qm02wCLcBGAs/s1600/loveladydpd.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="351" data-original-width="282" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ev2cumewFbM/WtKaMWU9BUI/AAAAAAAARmg/56630MiBy0cG-Eha1Fm6OABDb4f2qm02wCLcBGAs/s320/loveladydpd.JPG" width="257" /></a></div>
Bringing food up and down his open shirt? Guys all over the world eat meals every day with their damned shirt sprawled open. But then, as infantile as Raff* Sink is, I guess he's the only guy that would need a fucking bib. He's an idiot that thinks the world is full of idiots that believe his bullshit.<br />
<br />
Here is a capture from the Dave Wiegman film. It is estimated to have been taken within a second of Altgens 6...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qvAtmmyKqTE/WtKbg1jB3QI/AAAAAAAARms/9PkKBIvH9QcuXf2NY4nSk9Bsnqp98lIZQCLcBGAs/s1600/richard7weigman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="206" data-original-width="221" height="372" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qvAtmmyKqTE/WtKbg1jB3QI/AAAAAAAARms/9PkKBIvH9QcuXf2NY4nSk9Bsnqp98lIZQCLcBGAs/s400/richard7weigman.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
There's Billy Lovelady with his shirt sprawled open. Now, Raff* has a simple explanation for all of these instances of Billy's sprawled shirt....they're fake.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hfbvXlokfsw/WtKcJAokjOI/AAAAAAAARm0/aOOMp9e2g5QyMTh0SUdQQoJAIFX8WEb7ACLcBGAs/s1600/36.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="445" data-original-width="754" height="376" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hfbvXlokfsw/WtKcJAokjOI/AAAAAAAARm0/aOOMp9e2g5QyMTh0SUdQQoJAIFX8WEb7ACLcBGAs/s640/36.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Actually, the most widely circulated image of Lovelady from 22 November is Altgens 6 on the left, not the image on the right. But then Raff* never was one for facts. He enjoys the world of make believe.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n6lP6Sd0fkU/WtKcuquBc0I/AAAAAAAARm8/OM9TeCcC_xcqsZM4jko16cgaH5V1zeVCwCLcBGAs/s1600/37.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="632" data-original-width="751" height="538" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n6lP6Sd0fkU/WtKcuquBc0I/AAAAAAAARm8/OM9TeCcC_xcqsZM4jko16cgaH5V1zeVCwCLcBGAs/s640/37.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
The two figures above are Billy Lovelady. Fact.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xcA8AFS_vEM/WtKdDKdfD8I/AAAAAAAARnA/WaNnfdUX7VInIRoVv2gH68j2viixa7ZLwCLcBGAs/s1600/38.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="166" data-original-width="755" height="140" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xcA8AFS_vEM/WtKdDKdfD8I/AAAAAAAARnA/WaNnfdUX7VInIRoVv2gH68j2viixa7ZLwCLcBGAs/s640/38.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Raff* mentions Mary Bledsoe as evidence that Oswald's buttons were missing. What Raff* doesn't tell you is that the FBI coached Mary Bledsoe in her testimony by showing her the shirt prior to her appearance before the Warren Commission. And here we have Raff* relying on the Warren Commission agreeing with him that Oswald didn't change his shirt after arriving at his rooming house and before going to the Texas Theater. Raff* even quotes the famous Mae Brussell who quotes Oswald: "When I left the Texas School Book Depository, I went to my room where I changed my trousers, got a pistol, and went to a picture show"<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5s2s_LQD628/WtKj1yNV4RI/AAAAAAAARnY/BRAb8BvIXn4EiXRnpT41hqeHj3BKmHzNQCLcBGAs/s1600/mb4a.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="307" data-original-width="652" height="301" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5s2s_LQD628/WtKj1yNV4RI/AAAAAAAARnY/BRAb8BvIXn4EiXRnpT41hqeHj3BKmHzNQCLcBGAs/s640/mb4a.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<br />
The problem is, Oswald never said that. Mae Brussell changes Capt. Will Fritz's comments in his report included in the Warren Commission exhibits.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0llfMrNgY44/WtKkG2AProI/AAAAAAAARng/DHY0zYnFF9UBpu-p1FSbmPdyMHPe715qQCLcBGAs/s1600/Fritzreportpictureshow.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="131" data-original-width="616" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0llfMrNgY44/WtKkG2AProI/AAAAAAAARng/DHY0zYnFF9UBpu-p1FSbmPdyMHPe715qQCLcBGAs/s1600/Fritzreportpictureshow.JPG" /></a></div>
It was even in Fritz's notes....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-y6omvgq9Ync/WtKmwn7-e9I/AAAAAAAARnw/m47eu1Tgv6MOmX1sZ5UWLFVzkd9-HIt8QCLcBGAs/s1600/fnotes1b.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="512" data-original-width="804" height="406" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-y6omvgq9Ync/WtKmwn7-e9I/AAAAAAAARnw/m47eu1Tgv6MOmX1sZ5UWLFVzkd9-HIt8QCLcBGAs/s640/fnotes1b.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
You remember those notes that Raff* says we must believe. Well, Fritz's report also stated this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V40MLKp_XhY/WtKnFtkczhI/AAAAAAAARn0/ARa6qiNnVtMPuaAgUiquTNsIE3AVjr9-gCLcBGAs/s1600/Fritzreportshirtandtrousers.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="65" data-original-width="551" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V40MLKp_XhY/WtKnFtkczhI/AAAAAAAARn0/ARa6qiNnVtMPuaAgUiquTNsIE3AVjr9-gCLcBGAs/s1600/Fritzreportshirtandtrousers.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
and wouldn't you know...those all important must be believed notes contain this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0xdjCBq5vjCr7iLRCNWXPGmrI_J-foYT7bOYMa7M6MJQ-Yq7FRalDRpYoWVRuzplVGPdI2Y2YUQpO26kUy1xfn4Pq4v5hM5eXds2BkvlL-DL7wie_M2NxvvpxdoqVIq8oDBddEGTqAeKY/s1600/fnotes2.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="514" data-original-width="804" height="408" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0xdjCBq5vjCr7iLRCNWXPGmrI_J-foYT7bOYMa7M6MJQ-Yq7FRalDRpYoWVRuzplVGPdI2Y2YUQpO26kUy1xfn4Pq4v5hM5eXds2BkvlL-DL7wie_M2NxvvpxdoqVIq8oDBddEGTqAeKY/s640/fnotes2.png" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
But wait...there's more...Secret Service Agent Kelley was there as well....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HiFytdDMIdo/WtKnwispgaI/AAAAAAAARoE/KvKHYQGLMqg47E03GZ7rrHZAN3ljj1ebACLcBGAs/s1600/SSkelleyshirtandtrousers.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="113" data-original-width="623" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HiFytdDMIdo/WtKnwispgaI/AAAAAAAARoE/KvKHYQGLMqg47E03GZ7rrHZAN3ljj1ebACLcBGAs/s1600/SSkelleyshirtandtrousers.JPG" /></a></div>
I'll stop here and let all of the obfuscations by Raff* sink in....bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-16898680215161620802018-04-10T00:40:00.002+01:002018-04-10T00:40:48.853+01:00The Professor Has The FloorToday, I am posting a response to Raff* Sink by Professor James Norwood, Former Chairman of the OIC.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ROca9Fdq19g/Wsv3qB9wyGI/AAAAAAAARhY/NNnmgxcMtvAwcIYkU5rH6y6sjq669G1NQCLcBGAs/s1600/James.JPG" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="656" data-original-width="439" height="640" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ROca9Fdq19g/Wsv3qB9wyGI/AAAAAAAARhY/NNnmgxcMtvAwcIYkU5rH6y6sjq669G1NQCLcBGAs/s640/James.JPG" width="427" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Raff*
decided to attack Professor Norwood for simply responding to my post.
In the past I have allowed Professor Norwood to submit information and
post it for him here, where multitudes can read his remarks.<br />
<br />
Here is an open letter that I previously published and it is followed by Professor Norwood's most current comments...<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">June 6, 2015</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">An Open Letter to Fellow JFK
Researchers Concerning the Oswald Innocence Campaign:<br />
<br style="mso-special-character: line-break;" />
<br style="mso-special-character: line-break;" />
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">My name is James Norwood, and
I was a member of the Oswald Innocence Campaign (OIC) for several years. On
March 11, 2015, I assumed the position of Chair of the group. At that
time, I attempted to get to know the members on a personal basis and to
understand the workings of the OIC organization.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Recently, I have stepped down from my
position due to differences in philosophy with the founder, Ralph Cinque.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I am no longer a member of this group.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>At this time, I wish to share my views on the
Oswald Innocence Campaign.<br />
<br />
During my tenure as Chair, the OIC’s webpage listed 51 Senior Members along
with their photos and biographical profiles. But Mr. Cinque could only
locate e-mail addresses for 34 out of 51 members. This means that 17
members (33 1/3%) are not only non-active, but impossible to contact.
Additionally, in the group’s e-mail forum, only a handful of the Senior Members
ever participated in the discussions. Without a critical mass of active
members, the OIC is comprised primarily of a gallery of names and photos.
I understand that several of the members are in failing health and are
physically unable to participate. And, to be fair, I have experienced
several stimulating e-mail conversations, but, in each instance, there were
only three or four members sharing their views.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>If it is impossible even to contact by e-mail up to one-third of the
membership and only several members regularly engage in discussions, then this
organization is functionally non-existent.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span><br />
<br />
Mr. Cinque has dictated the content of the OIC home page with his single-minded
purpose of presenting amateur photo analyses.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>The seemingly endless diagrams of photo and film frame images are based
on the premise that the photos are fake.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>But there is no evidence presented that even remotely suggests where the
films and photos were altered, who altered them, and at what time the
alterations occurred. Based on my scrutiny of the OIC’s home page, the
theory of Altgens6 photo alteration is not persuasive, and, after years of
debate on the internet, it has never been taken seriously by even a fraction of
the JFK research community.<br />
<br />
Mr. Cinque also maintains a personal blog and a facebook page. He posts
daily internet commentaries that have recently expanded well beyond the purview
of the JFK assassination into such conspiracy theories as the death of Osama
bin Laden.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>As apparent in the two website
titles, Mr. Cinque gives the impression that his personal opinions reflect the
OIC organization as a whole. The OIC blog site is entitled "Oswald
in the Doorway: The Blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign."
The OIC facebook page is entitled, "Oswald Innocence Campaign:
Community." I am troubled that the subjective views of Mr. Cinque
are being presented in the guise of the OIC community, when in fact, the
opinions belong to Mr. Cinque alone with no group consensus whatsoever.
Many of the postings of Mr. Cinque are part of his ongoing personal quarrels on
the internet. There is no disclaimer indicating that his views do not represent
those of the organization as a whole.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I
have ethical concerns about a solitary writer engaging in nonstop,
profanity-laced verbal jousting that gives the impression that Mr. Cinque's
views are representative of the OIC members in general. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><br />
On May 26, I sent a proposal to Mr. Cinque for a new direction of the OIC away
from Altgens6 photo alteration and into the more general area of studies of the
JFK assassination and Oswald.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>My
proposal, which included the draft of a revised Mission Statement, was
categorically rejected by Mr. Cinque, who invited me to step down as Chair and
to exit the organization.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Due to (a) the
narrow focus and unpersuasive content of the present OIC homepage, (b) Mr.
Cinque’s misrepresentation of his personal postings on the blog/facebook pages,
(c) the inability to contact a third of the Senior Members, and (d) a host of
other issues, I am unable to recommend the Oswald Innocence Campaign to any
serious researcher of the JFK assassination. </span></div>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 14.0pt;"><br />
<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
<br />
<br />
James Norwood </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 14.0pt;">
</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><span style="font-size: large;">I have really appreciated these exposés
by bpete and the opportunity to write comments. They are well presented and
well-reasoned analyses. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">The point that Ralph Cinque is unable to grasp is the inherent subjectivity
involved in studying photographs. I find no anomaly and nothing sinister about
the photo with Dallas police officer whose head is bowed. We could take a poll
and probably find a few people who believe that the hat looks strange. But that
discussion will not advance our knowledge of the JFK assassination. It is
merely another time-waster like all of Ralph's endeavors (Oswald in the
Doorway, Mary Moorman as Babuska Lady, Bookhout as Ruby).</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">I recently came across yet another internet site dedicated to exposing the wild
and unsubstantiated photo conclusions of Ralph Cinque. The latest pictorial
blog was prepared by "Jack Jackson" and may be accessed at the
following site under the title of "Ralph Cinque Outed":</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">https://ralph-cinque-outed.blogspot.com/</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">In Jackson's numerous discussions of the photographs, it becomes immediately
apparent that (1) he has photo analytical skills that are vastly superior to
those of Ralph Cinque and (2) he has prepared meticulous presentations to
debunk Ralph's conclusions about such far-fetched issues as the tiny image of
the woman and child in Altgens6. Ralph believes the images of the woman and the
toddler have been “faked.” But this is just another example of a non-starter as
a line of inquiry.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">It is obvious that ANYONE can look at a photograph and draw fanciful conclusions.
It is a far more challenging discipline to support and corroborate photo
interpretations from hard evidence, including records, documents, affidavits,
eyewitness testimony. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">For example, in making their case for Oswald as Doorman,
Fetzer and Cinque rely on Will Fritz's scribbled notation "out with Bill
Shelley in front." But they fail to read the full narrative version of
Fritz's interrogation notes, which places his earlier scribbled notes in
context.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>On p. 2 of Fritz's transcribed
notes, he writes the following: "I asked him [Oswald] what part of the
building he was in when the President was shot, and he said he was having lunch
about that time on the first floor."<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>In other words, Oswald informed Fritz that he was INSIDE the building at
the time of the shooting. If he had been OUTSIDE the building with an
eyewitness (Shelley) to vouch for his presence, Oswald surely would have loudly
proclaimed such an airtight alibi to Fritz and to the reporters in the hall who
had asked him the same question.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">The source for the Fritz citation above may be found at:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=29104#relPageId=2&tab=page</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">********</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Ralph whiles away his life looking at photos, drawing subjective conclusions,
and never taking the time to persuasively build an argument based upon multiple
strands of evidence. He is only relying on the photos for opinion-driven
discourse. It is for this reason that Ralph's theory about Oswald in the
Doorway has never gained traction among serious JFK researchers.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">The main topics that bpete has been covering in his recent posts are:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">(1) Ralph's proclivity for revising and plagiarizing the work of others in the
articles that appear on the OIC home page;</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">(2) The blatant use of circular reasoning used by Ralph and Jim Fetzer to
advance their claims (i.e., "We have proven that Altgens6 is fake, thus we
need no other evidence to demonstrate that it is Oswald standing in the
doorway."); and</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">(3) the absence of a scientific foundation or even a crude knowledge of photographic
art in the 1960s, in order to demonstrate their hypotheses; </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Another point that I have added in one my comments is Ralph's lack of civility
in his internet discourse. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">In raising the topic of the "hat trick,” Ralph is overtly transparent in
his attempt to deflect attention away from the valid criticisms of his work, as
enumerated in bpete’s thoughtful presentations.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>Thank you Professor Norwood. I will be posting this on both of my blogs...B</i> </div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-29785170086031123052018-04-09T01:45:00.003+01:002018-04-09T01:45:42.381+01:00Series Note 3Raff* Sink continues to change the OIC website based on this continuing series.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJ6FrbLp9TXPwdZj9dO6k2B51CXJ6d7U6j7vGu4OvqMZvtnp5O1Ixcd6EfcUpUavhShR2_FYj0Ht4-JyLko9kge9J4bYG_2ANce4sLREj3-CGn8vw7Ftib0T4l3RW2hBVCjLJOxVt4e1oL/s1600/sn3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="190" data-original-width="528" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJ6FrbLp9TXPwdZj9dO6k2B51CXJ6d7U6j7vGu4OvqMZvtnp5O1Ixcd6EfcUpUavhShR2_FYj0Ht4-JyLko9kge9J4bYG_2ANce4sLREj3-CGn8vw7Ftib0T4l3RW2hBVCjLJOxVt4e1oL/s1600/sn3.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
This can only mean that the little asshat feels it necessary to correct James H. Fetzer's expert commentary.<br />
<br />
I am currently working on the next issue of this series where I will combine the next two pages of the Oswald's Incompetent Clowns website. The first covers Lee Oswald and his similarity to their "Doorman" and the second, Billy Lovelady and his dissimilarity to himself. You will see how Raff* Sink completely abandons all sense of reason and logic in an attempt to prove his ridiculous and outlandish claims.<br />
<br />
Check in towards the end of the week for the next addition and thank you for your viewership.bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-14556872661718234902018-04-08T00:28:00.001+01:002018-04-08T00:28:18.108+01:00Founded in Fetzering Part 6I continue with the post of James H. Fetzer, PhD, (at least the part that Raff* Sink hasn't altered....yet) on The Oswald's Incompetent Clowns website.<br />
<br />
He has explained with twisted logic that supposedly Oswald was out front, in the entryway, of the Texas School Book Depository, when President was shot. He has claimed that Billy Lovelady, seen in the Altgens6 photo, is actually Oswald. All evidence to date has proven this claim to be false.<br />
<br />
Fetzer is now describing his first interaction with starvation clinic guru, Raff* Sink.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TevNIiC5o9c/WsbAF-akzqI/AAAAAAAARd8/Ve7joRkksQwCB6uPLbxdU3VRxpb6nUtMACLcBGAs/s1600/21.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="289" data-original-width="675" height="273" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TevNIiC5o9c/WsbAF-akzqI/AAAAAAAARd8/Ve7joRkksQwCB6uPLbxdU3VRxpb6nUtMACLcBGAs/s640/21.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Circular reasoning. That the Altgens6 was altered....the OIC has yet to show any proof that the photo was altered. That the Altgens6 was altered, it would only have been altered if someone had been there who should not have been there. The OIC has yet to show that anyone was in the photo that wasn't supposed to be there. The only person who could have been there that wasn't supposed to be there was Oswald. The OIC has yet to prove that Oswald was in the photo.<br />
<br />
The Altgens6 photo would have only been altered if Oswald was in the photo. Oswald was in the photo, therefore it was altered.<br />
<br />
Enter Raff* Sink....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FiPvCaP0pdM/Wsa-i3jG3OI/AAAAAAAARd0/dRWsewMwpRoI5MjkVh4YW7XoB3DHd2SNACEwYBhgL/s1600/26.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="248" data-original-width="686" height="230" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FiPvCaP0pdM/Wsa-i3jG3OI/AAAAAAAARd0/dRWsewMwpRoI5MjkVh4YW7XoB3DHd2SNACEwYBhgL/s640/26.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Actually, the clothing of Lee Oswald was taken into consideration by researchers over the years, when it comes to the claim that Oswald was in the doorway. Through emphasizing FBI malfeasance and unadulterated bullshit, the OIC has proclaimed to have re-solved a mystery that was settled many years before.<br />
<br />
Fetzer emphasizes the clothing...in detail. Something hard to do when you consider that their "Doorman"'s clothing seen in Altgens6 consists of a shirt and a partially exposed t-shirt. The position of the OIC has morphed over the years where originally, Raff* Sink was claiming that their "Doorman" was wearing a plaid shirt and that Oswald's shirt at a distance, took on a plaid appearance to no the shirt is in no way plaid to finally come full circle and claim that the mysterious "they" altered Oswald shirt to look plaid. Fetzer ends this section by claiming that Lovelady went to the FBI and showed them the shirt he wore that day, an "incredibly implausible thing to do unless it were true". The problem is that it isn't true.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-P95iywG2jQE/WsjAt1IUNNI/AAAAAAAAReM/CfCQs1YxY4IxlLLqYoA-GR5Zoo_TALVRgCLcBGAs/s1600/23.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="255" data-original-width="661" height="244" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-P95iywG2jQE/WsjAt1IUNNI/AAAAAAAAReM/CfCQs1YxY4IxlLLqYoA-GR5Zoo_TALVRgCLcBGAs/s640/23.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
As you will find on the pages of the OIC, Raff* Sink and Richard Hooke have half-assed their way to try to convince the world that they have exonerated Oswald. To date, the OIC and it's collective clown posse has yet to provide any proof that Altgens 6 was altered. Anyone familiar with Fetzer knows full well that he relies on his "expertise" in scientific reasoning yet falls short in exhibiting any, on any subject.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zNaO-dBmnUM/WsjCv4HoRGI/AAAAAAAARec/p76RutTD_aUMw81zknSYJt4l4iT6cuaTQCLcBGAs/s1600/24.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="210" data-original-width="663" height="202" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zNaO-dBmnUM/WsjCv4HoRGI/AAAAAAAARec/p76RutTD_aUMw81zknSYJt4l4iT6cuaTQCLcBGAs/s640/24.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
More circular reasoning. The OIC cannot produce any proof that Altgens 6 was altered. None.<br />
<br />
In the case of Oswald telling Fritz that he was "out with Bill Shelley in front", the FBI contained it in one report and Bill Shelley was specifically questioned about that by the FBI and the Warren Commission.<br />
<br />
This is the statement made by Bill Shelley to the FBI....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XpjEAjQN9oY/WsjIDP5-iYI/AAAAAAAARew/RWhWfeGC1E8LAWC4V3fdSh4Xbvb8RDYQgCLcBGAs/s1600/Shelleyaboutoswaldleaving.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="663" data-original-width="529" height="640" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XpjEAjQN9oY/WsjIDP5-iYI/AAAAAAAARew/RWhWfeGC1E8LAWC4V3fdSh4Xbvb8RDYQgCLcBGAs/s640/Shelleyaboutoswaldleaving.JPG" width="510" /></a></div>
<br />
Shelly's testimony before the WC....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXt1MCVlXGNbdG_O1zHT9SkeMFK68K_IkHMcuIdlmZz1IQH_GxNFnnasQTegjeW9Gkdn2V7CM8hp8nxGXWwMEb5rwGe6y55r8MMOsC2_6rsQxrEU5UHUdKwF3AuLBOZTBDPTjNEQ2kguo8/s1600/Shelleynooswald.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="322" data-original-width="674" height="305" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXt1MCVlXGNbdG_O1zHT9SkeMFK68K_IkHMcuIdlmZz1IQH_GxNFnnasQTegjeW9Gkdn2V7CM8hp8nxGXWwMEb5rwGe6y55r8MMOsC2_6rsQxrEU5UHUdKwF3AuLBOZTBDPTjNEQ2kguo8/s640/Shelleynooswald.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
It stands to reason that the FBI and the Warren Commission questioned Shelley specifically about Oswald leaving work because of what Oswald told Fritz in the presence of the FBI.<br />
<br />
Now, let's discuss Fetzer's scientific reasoning and the "inference to the best explanation". The OIC claims that Oswald had to mean that he was out with Bill Shelley in front <i>during</i> the shooting. Every report that covers Oswald's comment about where he was during the shooting state that Oswald said he was on the first floor. Secret Service Inspector Kelley specifically asked Oswald if he had watched the parade and Oswald said no. The OIC claim that Bill Shelley left the front of the TSBD immediately after the shooting has been shown to be false.<br />
<br />
Now which explanation is the best....Oswald was exactly where he said he was during the shooting or everyone that wrote a report lied, a photograph that hit the news wire within an hour of the shooting was secretly altered by the mysterious "they" and everyone standing next to Bill Shelley was able to cover up the fact that Oswald was right out front with them the whole time.<br />
<br />
Fetzer continues....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl8r6nFg1zZ8A9PDYvmiFveMvs9U7evef4H2Jt9BYtIttMeTozuXH6fdVJqgDJY6Rq8f2jLCmhLJyZGosqBZhGtfNj7q9p1pE-zxEPKDzUCxyHtljcp_TLh6RjkgROaeZMyfKQ9b_zNRlY/s1600/29.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="122" data-original-width="671" height="116" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl8r6nFg1zZ8A9PDYvmiFveMvs9U7evef4H2Jt9BYtIttMeTozuXH6fdVJqgDJY6Rq8f2jLCmhLJyZGosqBZhGtfNj7q9p1pE-zxEPKDzUCxyHtljcp_TLh6RjkgROaeZMyfKQ9b_zNRlY/s640/29.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
The statement above proves that James H. Fetzer, PhD, is a loon. And I'm not the only one that thinks so.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013/08/668-james-fetzer.html">Encyclopedia of American Loons: #668 James Fetzer</a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
While there is no reasonable alternative to his hypothesis that Oswald was the "Man in the Doorway", there is certainly a preponderance of testimonial and photographic evidence proving that the man was Billy Lovelady.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
That wraps up the Overview page of the Oswald's Incompetent Clowns website. Next we will move on to the Oswald page.....</div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-43258745471089844892018-04-02T12:07:00.002+01:002018-04-02T12:07:11.012+01:00Series Note 2This current series of dismantling the Oswald Incompetent Clown's website has caused Raff* Sink to do some alterations.<br />
<br />
Two days ago he decided to take it upon himself to change the words of former Chairman James H. Fetzer, PhD. Last night, Raff* Sink was back at it, making corrections and "bolstering" his information.<br />
<br />
This is just an example of the maniacal ego of Raff*. He has emphatically claimed that what we all see as an elbow, is not an elbow....<br />
<br />
This is how he described my photo on his blog....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CpV7vSa_Tpk/WsIIfHcbjJI/AAAAAAAARbE/Aoz7OIaVA-8DGPYChk0PMiFgIEnPfvPkgCLcBGAs/s1600/notanelbow.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="637" data-original-width="492" height="640" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CpV7vSa_Tpk/WsIIfHcbjJI/AAAAAAAARbE/Aoz7OIaVA-8DGPYChk0PMiFgIEnPfvPkgCLcBGAs/s640/notanelbow.JPG" width="494" /></a></div>
<br />
And here is where he describes his changes...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn1n9vEyU-QPWvBhE4QM-o4miuzOrwBZERSAjv6jD_Why_moZaJRFf3prf4XwkgfT2PR5qkrZZiS6mv_0h3dWp0hGbx9TSCgQs83GEimSjc2aQID0QcMLt9vBus6ju7QHJUts5EPJlhI3B/s1600/notanelbow1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="645" data-original-width="602" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn1n9vEyU-QPWvBhE4QM-o4miuzOrwBZERSAjv6jD_Why_moZaJRFf3prf4XwkgfT2PR5qkrZZiS6mv_0h3dWp0hGbx9TSCgQs83GEimSjc2aQID0QcMLt9vBus6ju7QHJUts5EPJlhI3B/s640/notanelbow1.JPG" width="596" /></a></div>
<br />
"Bolstered" the hell out of that didn't he....<br />
<br />
But I need to take this moment to remind Raff* and inform my readers that this very subject was covered separately by the Former Chairman of the OIC, James H. Fetzer, PhD, and the Current Chairman of the OIC Larry Rivera, APS (auto parts salesman).<br />
<br />
Back in March 2013, Fetzer and Rivera published an article on the Veterans Today website and Fetzer as was his habit, copied the publication on the Education Forum.<br />
<br />
You can read it here: <a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20013-jfk-why-buell-wesley-frazier-was-erased-from-altgens6/">http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20013-jfk-why-buell-wesley-frazier-was-erased-from-altgens6/</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-K_QX_9C7kFo/WsIKapNnPYI/AAAAAAAARbY/MEtzvTk_mpspEE0sPk7ShfQGUHTamO08QCLcBGAs/s1600/Rivfetz4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="646" data-original-width="1143" height="225" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-K_QX_9C7kFo/WsIKapNnPYI/AAAAAAAARbY/MEtzvTk_mpspEE0sPk7ShfQGUHTamO08QCLcBGAs/s400/Rivfetz4.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
In that article, Rivera shows these photos.....<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkzq3p-cWSWZ0nrrsbMLxuGQ1eYSfglgsMKL-P7HhO0Fa8p0ooIAGfl9_lGP-vfYVBHT_K8G6A6wRFA37jnryfI5bP15ogcDmXylDqxxCUDLmpVOCP0zIkv7A2PztcdDTlOGooi7suadt0/s1600/Rivfetz1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="359" data-original-width="516" height="444" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkzq3p-cWSWZ0nrrsbMLxuGQ1eYSfglgsMKL-P7HhO0Fa8p0ooIAGfl9_lGP-vfYVBHT_K8G6A6wRFA37jnryfI5bP15ogcDmXylDqxxCUDLmpVOCP0zIkv7A2PztcdDTlOGooi7suadt0/s640/Rivfetz1.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
These two Einsteins are too dense to realize that the strange light streak or artifact that is not a part of the limo is actually the top of the flag post on the front fender of the limo.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsn6XOpghfsoWHyxN2sZZWO3qS97sN0MPqSTrVIVOtkYUvtWVm-KihrIhyEugGzWXW0352YQnBQseF23xTQcGkP56pJyqDaqHTtjh0yZaDsGwuAnX7WtafFtGZHQZphZ9c5eBRH4jOF3sK/s1600/Rivfetz2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="490" data-original-width="566" height="554" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsn6XOpghfsoWHyxN2sZZWO3qS97sN0MPqSTrVIVOtkYUvtWVm-KihrIhyEugGzWXW0352YQnBQseF23xTQcGkP56pJyqDaqHTtjh0yZaDsGwuAnX7WtafFtGZHQZphZ9c5eBRH4jOF3sK/s640/Rivfetz2.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Both the former and current Chairman of the OIC agree that the man that Fetzer originally though was Bill Shelley, is shielding his eye, making an elbow an elbow. (I think Fetzer still contends that it is a whiteout patch in Altgens but I lost interest some years back. He's a whack job.)But, they think the person below the elbow guy is Buell Frazier. It's not.<br />
<br />
They continue...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2ZPAIlu73kc/WsIMK_JDx2I/AAAAAAAARbw/9ROltudcYq8--btFDLGx4mYY9I429BH_ACLcBGAs/s1600/Rivfetz3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="546" data-original-width="551" height="634" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2ZPAIlu73kc/WsIMK_JDx2I/AAAAAAAARbw/9ROltudcYq8--btFDLGx4mYY9I429BH_ACLcBGAs/s640/Rivfetz3.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Actually, Frazier testified he was one step down in the doorway when he was describing where he was first located. He also identified Billy Lovelady as the OIC's 'Doorman" in the Altgens 6 photo and stated that he (Frazier) was standing back in the shadow to block the sun from his eyes at the time of the photo. But the strange this is, Fetzer, Rivera and Raff* all ignore Frazier's testimony that his coat was in the basement when he went outside for lunch and therefore could not be dressed in black in the Altgens 6 photo.<br />
<br />
The mysterious person in black has been identified as Ruth Dean...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5t9qUZATp7A/WsINbxFvS5I/AAAAAAAARb8/UnAKZmdCKGk-QQStCBcsKitOWJFRioCegCLcBGAs/s1600/reesedean.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="486" data-original-width="500" height="620" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5t9qUZATp7A/WsINbxFvS5I/AAAAAAAARb8/UnAKZmdCKGk-QQStCBcsKitOWJFRioCegCLcBGAs/s640/reesedean.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/displayimage.php?pid=12639&fullsize=1">https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/displayimage.php?pid=12639&fullsize=1</a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Raff* Sink has turned the OIC website into his personal soap box. I doubt that many, if any of the members listed on the front page actually have read or read the site to stay current. It's a one man band at the OIC and the head buffoon is Raff* Sink......</div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-28236989130045544062018-04-02T04:28:00.003+01:002018-04-02T04:40:50.793+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 5Let's pick up where we left off...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-eW_Ind7sNjk/WsGE_Fk0Q7I/AAAAAAAARZE/TK09lF8dQ8MmV_dmVytZnrZvHcWxnMafACLcBGAs/s1600/18.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="289" data-original-width="679" height="272" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-eW_Ind7sNjk/WsGE_Fk0Q7I/AAAAAAAARZE/TK09lF8dQ8MmV_dmVytZnrZvHcWxnMafACLcBGAs/s640/18.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
James H. Fetzer, PhD, is pulling out his trump card. Whenever a film or picture shows something that doesn't go with Fetzer's narrative, he claims that something was altered. He's done it with the Zapruder film, autopsy photos and various other photos taken around Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination. You will see in a minute how wrong he is.<br />
<br />
Fetzer states that it would have been unbelievably remiss of Capt. Will Fritz not to have asked Oswald where he was at the time of the shooting. He did. On multiple days. Fetzer chooses to ignore the fact that Fritz asked Oswald where he was on the day he was arrested and during questioning the next day.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n1Bp-UFVSSw/WsGIR1gJNdI/AAAAAAAARZc/V6CRxgbumd4PnCnnZHPwLvnwbaelzzavwCLcBGAs/s1600/fnotes1a.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="512" data-original-width="804" height="406" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n1Bp-UFVSSw/WsGIR1gJNdI/AAAAAAAARZc/V6CRxgbumd4PnCnnZHPwLvnwbaelzzavwCLcBGAs/s640/fnotes1a.png" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Fritz Notes Page 1</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VNDFLjYoAc0/WsGSaDL6cPI/AAAAAAAARZw/ESYCuZjHAHERRgtGkEwImjGyf46JFSdTACLcBGAs/s1600/fnotes3a.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="506" data-original-width="812" height="398" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VNDFLjYoAc0/WsGSaDL6cPI/AAAAAAAARZw/ESYCuZjHAHERRgtGkEwImjGyf46JFSdTACLcBGAs/s640/fnotes3a.png" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Fritz Notes Page 3</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj92xW6tTdKnVzXuDBT3az8-xFM1ddAcE7Ez55cNdypsKa-JobCObKB3CXXMlu5oXbCjTfj2biIAp24ytlhzN6hnHtIk21gF3QBE9Ytnaqef4X0u6uLcmCduEI6EF1kZ5pugWwb64onwRmR/s1600/Fritztest1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="487" data-original-width="554" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj92xW6tTdKnVzXuDBT3az8-xFM1ddAcE7Ez55cNdypsKa-JobCObKB3CXXMlu5oXbCjTfj2biIAp24ytlhzN6hnHtIk21gF3QBE9Ytnaqef4X0u6uLcmCduEI6EF1kZ5pugWwb64onwRmR/s1600/Fritztest1.JPG" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Fritz testimony concerning the first day of questioning</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xm2LFkcwwAs/WsGTJwYgOvI/AAAAAAAARZ8/7qOepL0IW54p9xyVyAcyg9fiSlp4QUsQQCLcBGAs/s1600/Fritztest2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="544" data-original-width="550" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xm2LFkcwwAs/WsGTJwYgOvI/AAAAAAAARZ8/7qOepL0IW54p9xyVyAcyg9fiSlp4QUsQQCLcBGAs/s1600/Fritztest2.JPG" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Fritz testimony concerning the next day of questioning</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Now to answer Fetzer's 3 questions...<br />
1. Why would Oswald say he was out front with Shelley if it were not true?...Who the fuck knows. Oswald lied about several things during his questioning. He would say one thing one day and when confronted by Fritz (with additional knowledge) he would change his story.Oswald could have seen Shelley as he was leaving the TSBD and thought Shelley saw him. <br />
2. Why mention Shelley unless Lee thought Shelley would confirm it?.. See answer 1.<br />
3. How could he have known Shelley was out there if Lee hadn't seen him?... Simple. He didn't see him in the building. He could have guessed. He could have assumed that he was outside with most everyone else. But then again, he could have seen him go outside. He could have walked through the lobby on his way up the front stairs and seen Shelley, who was standing at the back of the front landing, through the full length glass at the doorway. He could have seen Shelley when he left the TSBD.<br />
<br />
For someone that claims to be an expert in critical thinking, Fetzer sure shows a lack trying.<br />
<br />
But now we get to the nuts and bolts. Fetzer sees that Altgens6 was altered....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-q8Ax5-E_g5E/WsGE2qFmSVI/AAAAAAAARZI/ZmbfVgAli00x58U3RHT8lu3h_zUDRs18ACEwYBhgL/s1600/20.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="381" data-original-width="670" height="363" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-q8Ax5-E_g5E/WsGE2qFmSVI/AAAAAAAARZI/ZmbfVgAli00x58U3RHT8lu3h_zUDRs18ACEwYBhgL/s640/20.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Here's a blow up of the collage...(the collage is not from John McAdams)<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jSwl5Rn5_WI/WsGZCD7BPXI/AAAAAAAARaQ/2THOI20cVZU5O8t9OF0efaS0fx1bJfsZwCLcBGAs/s1600/lovelady-2_highlight1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="184" data-original-width="320" height="368" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jSwl5Rn5_WI/WsGZCD7BPXI/AAAAAAAARaQ/2THOI20cVZU5O8t9OF0efaS0fx1bJfsZwCLcBGAs/s640/lovelady-2_highlight1.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Original collage by Jerry Organ (circle added by Oswald's Incompetent Clowns)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Now, up to this point, James H. Fetzer, PhD, has totally ignored Fritz's notes, testimony, reports by the FBI, Secret Service, Fritz's report of the interrogations and statements to the FBI identifying Lovelady as the man in question in the Altgens 6 photograph. Shelley had even made a statement to the FBI saying that he was standing behind Lovelady in the Altgens photo but Fetzer was having none of that.<br />
<br />
Here is what he seized on...a person shielding their eyes from the sun. Doing precisely what the person below them on the steps, is doing. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaUm9QxTZdaUABZ-KkClWZmVZVKxae5hoIfdBmEpodHi6kfzmuU0sJH2UfxOHx8TWF4U0-MpoqpXWwcWxapykG1Zv-pFgIMhyWzblACqT0wAbEpSsTC1loyQGRx6IeRlPHyJoL3Hmvup6V/s1600/elbowshot.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="261" data-original-width="278" height="375" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiaUm9QxTZdaUABZ-KkClWZmVZVKxae5hoIfdBmEpodHi6kfzmuU0sJH2UfxOHx8TWF4U0-MpoqpXWwcWxapykG1Zv-pFgIMhyWzblACqT0wAbEpSsTC1loyQGRx6IeRlPHyJoL3Hmvup6V/s400/elbowshot.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EC7r3XDLaqU/WsGeKKJdzSI/AAAAAAAARak/0ho_DfURVk85wwfV5qwf_sxKHYx6a5hjwCLcBGAs/s1600/21a.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="179" data-original-width="671" height="170" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EC7r3XDLaqU/WsGeKKJdzSI/AAAAAAAARak/0ho_DfURVk85wwfV5qwf_sxKHYx6a5hjwCLcBGAs/s640/21a.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
First things first. Oswald's comments about what he was doing and where he was at the time of the shooting was covered in several FBI and Secret Service reports. FBI Agent Bookhout specifically mentions Shelley in his report.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pStNfbXN7mo/WsGhSQV70iI/AAAAAAAARaw/cg79hxyvROs5X7l1_VJjNgvWQL_zAqakACLcBGAs/s1600/Bookhout1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="557" data-original-width="686" height="518" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pStNfbXN7mo/WsGhSQV70iI/AAAAAAAARaw/cg79hxyvROs5X7l1_VJjNgvWQL_zAqakACLcBGAs/s640/Bookhout1.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
You can see that Fetzer's 35 years of logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning has been shot to hell.<br />
<br />
In the next installment....enter fashion maven, Raff* Sink.......<br />
<br />
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-17132979278376339222018-04-01T14:15:00.002+01:002018-04-01T14:19:26.320+01:00Series NoteDue to this series, Raff* Sink has decided to start changing things at the Oswald's Incompetent Clowns website....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-t0UV688rsQA/WsDbG6c-5WI/AAAAAAAARYg/ZV7-k1FqF-0DFnhBvPQlobxPBC0qVAYxgCLcBGAs/s1600/minion1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="128" data-original-width="502" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-t0UV688rsQA/WsDbG6c-5WI/AAAAAAAARYg/ZV7-k1FqF-0DFnhBvPQlobxPBC0qVAYxgCLcBGAs/s1600/minion1.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
In other words, he's putting words in the PhD's mouth.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iPxTuC1kavc/WsDcMOeD1oI/AAAAAAAARYs/SxMzyUGM67kcnq3F3NJ2l2eWOMMq0IeIgCLcBGAs/s1600/minion2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="105" data-original-width="514" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iPxTuC1kavc/WsDcMOeD1oI/AAAAAAAARYs/SxMzyUGM67kcnq3F3NJ2l2eWOMMq0IeIgCLcBGAs/s1600/minion2.JPG" /></a></div>
The minion has been up all night....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZebpHDmd40T0p6VrchrBKDY8_zOTpe3_o5h4e4sfrzSdDIdSZmjkcmhPv0jpI6w2TfvRX8JPXRkrEg83TL3Y7Kgai4X_qp20qmIV8XCmBhFd1rlMWu7AcuBH1fkUvAx6U6GmKD4YWyPG2/s1600/cinqueminion.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="510" data-original-width="330" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZebpHDmd40T0p6VrchrBKDY8_zOTpe3_o5h4e4sfrzSdDIdSZmjkcmhPv0jpI6w2TfvRX8JPXRkrEg83TL3Y7Kgai4X_qp20qmIV8XCmBhFd1rlMWu7AcuBH1fkUvAx6U6GmKD4YWyPG2/s320/cinqueminion.jpg" width="207" /></a></div>
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-77010846277540254792018-03-31T19:10:00.000+01:002018-03-31T19:21:25.293+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 4Before I continue with the bloviations of James H. Fetzer, PhD, I want to remind you of a statement made by the OIC in my previous post...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VrpAUozCzmA/Wr981qt8pvI/AAAAAAAARVo/yMuyqecdzNcoRqp_DUVDATIoC3ZSdIUiQCLcBGAs/s1600/17.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="104" data-original-width="725" height="90" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VrpAUozCzmA/Wr981qt8pvI/AAAAAAAARVo/yMuyqecdzNcoRqp_DUVDATIoC3ZSdIUiQCLcBGAs/s640/17.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Oswald's Incompetent Clowns are going to show the "stark dissimilarity" of Billy Lovelady and their "Doorman". And they plan to do this by establishing the likeness of Oswald and their "Doorman". But didn't they also tell us that the mysterious "they" moved facial features from Billy Lovelady to "Doorman"? Raff* Sink even mentioned that the HSCA hired anthropologists to examine the Altgens 6 photo but they never considered that the photographic managing "they", altered the photos (which must have also included the original negatives and every copy made). So, we must throw out the facial features of Billy Lovelady and rely entirely on a shirt and the t-shirt beneath it. I mean, we want to be scientific in our approach to satisfy James H. Fetzer, PhD, right? You will soon see that the scientific method goes out the window at the OIC along with every other logical thinking process.<br />
<br />
But for now, let's get back to James H. Fetzer, PhD....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IXDTsjDqgco/Wr-AQ3MN5ZI/AAAAAAAARV0/9q1SdJFPSgoIfJexiHEblnN0NFpCPtlzwCLcBGAs/s1600/15.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="486" data-original-width="679" height="456" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IXDTsjDqgco/Wr-AQ3MN5ZI/AAAAAAAARV0/9q1SdJFPSgoIfJexiHEblnN0NFpCPtlzwCLcBGAs/s640/15.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
First a little background on Will Fritz's notes.<br />
Copies of which can be found at the Mary Ferrell Foundation here: <a href="https://www.maryferrell.org/php/showlist.php?docset=1101">Papers of Capt. Will Fritz<span style="color: black;"></span></a><br />
<br />
Many researchers say that Fritz's notes were not written at the time of the interrogation of Oswald. Some claim that they were written by Fritz after reading reports by others (FBI, Secret Service, etc.). I make no claim as to when they were written, they are what they are.<br />
<br />
Back to Fetzer. He states that it was the discovery by him, of these notes that caused him to take another look at the Altgens 6 photo. He continues.....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Pqm2wM02PyQ/Wr-Pw3RO_jI/AAAAAAAARWE/qqWDw_ixGJYy1--88pvMzrOu3ehKyNW5gCLcBGAs/s1600/16.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="340" data-original-width="668" height="324" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Pqm2wM02PyQ/Wr-Pw3RO_jI/AAAAAAAARWE/qqWDw_ixGJYy1--88pvMzrOu3ehKyNW5gCLcBGAs/s640/16.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Fetzer claims to be an expert in "critical thinking" and yet his description above is nothing more than disconnected bullshit. Let's break it down...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WGiksqFptQE/Wr-VRl4dsgI/AAAAAAAARWU/gITshZmwA3MHMJr6i6LKO59QSlwaSfIEACLcBGAs/s1600/16a.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="117" data-original-width="668" height="112" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WGiksqFptQE/Wr-VRl4dsgI/AAAAAAAARWU/gITshZmwA3MHMJr6i6LKO59QSlwaSfIEACLcBGAs/s640/16a.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Some have claimed that Lee was not talking about his location during the shooting but some time thereafter but that makes no sense at all because...Oswald could not have been referring to being outside with Bill Shelly before the shooting. That sums up Fetzer's critical thinking skills in a nutshell.<br />
<br />
For a breakdown of Carolyn Arnold's statements concerning seeing Oswald go here: <a href="http://www.oswaldinnocencecampaign.com/2015/11/founded-in-fetzering.html">Founded In Fetzering</a><br />
<br />
(You will notice throughout this series that the OIC, Raff* and Fetzer particularly, put full faith in Will Fritz's notes in this instance but will disregard every other statement, report or even additional comments in these notes when needed.)<br />
<br />
So Fetzer contends that Oswald can't be talking about after the shooting because he couldn't be talking about before the shooting. Let's continue...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-573U0N0csJc/Wr-X4NkgV3I/AAAAAAAARWg/oFiqM15yh-c7sot3DxPFHibUC15ym6I6gCLcBGAs/s1600/16b.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="60" data-original-width="668" height="56" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-573U0N0csJc/Wr-X4NkgV3I/AAAAAAAARWg/oFiqM15yh-c7sot3DxPFHibUC15ym6I6gCLcBGAs/s640/16b.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
The OIC have decided that the 90 second time frame from shooting to Baker seeing Oswald in the second floor lunchroom is legit. Personally I think the 90 second time frame established by the Warren Commission is highly questionable but that's neither here nor there. We're going to hold the OIC to their claims.<br />
<br />
Now it gets interesting....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-yPVXgRiT72Y/Wr-YtM89GxI/AAAAAAAARWo/yP_A70-Oe2EHCbBX3aikJbkBLu3GDDyZACLcBGAs/s1600/16c.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="148" data-original-width="667" height="142" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-yPVXgRiT72Y/Wr-YtM89GxI/AAAAAAAARWo/yP_A70-Oe2EHCbBX3aikJbkBLu3GDDyZACLcBGAs/s640/16c.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Fetzer omits a lot of information in his misrepresentation of Shelley's statements. William "Bill" Shelley was interviewed on multiple days concerning his actions on the day of the assassination and testified before the Warren Commission. There is one interview report by the FBI, dated March 18, 1964, that claims Shelley said he left immediately after the shooting with Billy Lovelady, to head down to the railroad tracks. But, Fetzer ignores the fact that in that same report, Shelley denies seeing Oswald when the President was shot.<br />
Here is that report...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vmf_JOfvrjY/Wr--PHBj8kI/AAAAAAAARW4/mbMx4Gxn55UolaLaikdyUiNaFoeT5B1fQCLcBGAs/s1600/Shelleyreport3-18-64%25281%2529.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="665" data-original-width="528" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vmf_JOfvrjY/Wr--PHBj8kI/AAAAAAAARW4/mbMx4Gxn55UolaLaikdyUiNaFoeT5B1fQCLcBGAs/s1600/Shelleyreport3-18-64%25281%2529.JPG" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbuaEIDMjboDcleuzhwDA-X7b73yJ9uPQ3gA_OlmJ2EQPpurVN_kdRkvbObXGh11V-486lcoP-Szlj4XFO41QB5KK8xTPduby-J8kjqZWRKf_nZWOX7l7Hi6e8Jd0tt9S0ZQ4qBKyexwRB/s1600/Shelleyreport3-18-64%25282%2529.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="670" data-original-width="525" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbuaEIDMjboDcleuzhwDA-X7b73yJ9uPQ3gA_OlmJ2EQPpurVN_kdRkvbObXGh11V-486lcoP-Szlj4XFO41QB5KK8xTPduby-J8kjqZWRKf_nZWOX7l7Hi6e8Jd0tt9S0ZQ4qBKyexwRB/s1600/Shelleyreport3-18-64%25282%2529.JPG" /></a></div>
Shelley also provided an affidavit on the day of the assassination to the Dallas Police, in which there is no mention of a trip to the railroad tracks. Here is that affidavit...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G1Je512I0qk/Wr-_iZz7ehI/AAAAAAAARXI/iDJpgBwCnJwFAbtWHXaWsV4PkFse-UjewCLcBGAs/s1600/Shelleyaffidavit%2B11-22-63.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1234" height="640" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G1Je512I0qk/Wr-_iZz7ehI/AAAAAAAARXI/iDJpgBwCnJwFAbtWHXaWsV4PkFse-UjewCLcBGAs/s640/Shelleyaffidavit%2B11-22-63.gif" width="493" /></a></div>
<br />
Shelley also testified in front of the Warren Commission representatives and here is his testimony concerning when he left the front of the building...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sqCUarjd7Cc/Wr_LhrN18QI/AAAAAAAARXY/WXFbo2DxQVgq6HERXj7n9jKJ1C4XZvXLwCLcBGAs/s1600/oo6.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="187" data-original-width="461" height="161" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sqCUarjd7Cc/Wr_LhrN18QI/AAAAAAAARXY/WXFbo2DxQVgq6HERXj7n9jKJ1C4XZvXLwCLcBGAs/s400/oo6.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
And most interesting of all, Shelley was interviewed specifically about the Altgens 6 photo and identified Billy Lovelady as the OIC's "Doorman"....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-31_yew6q2A0/Wr_MgPy1s8I/AAAAAAAARXg/Uf840WwVpfEQG9bajN93dXyXOJNdYiOaACLcBGAs/s1600/ShelleyaboutAltgens6.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="666" data-original-width="526" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-31_yew6q2A0/Wr_MgPy1s8I/AAAAAAAARXg/Uf840WwVpfEQG9bajN93dXyXOJNdYiOaACLcBGAs/s1600/ShelleyaboutAltgens6.JPG" /></a></div>
So as you can see, James H. Fetzer, PhD, is being very selective about the evidence he uses to make the claim that Oswald could in no way be talking about after the shooting as the time that he was out front with Bill Shelley. This is typical of James H. Fetzer, PhD, and Raff* Sink. Their description of Shelley and Lovelady being gone from in front of the TSBD immediately after the shooting will come up again as we travel through the OIC's website and their compelling evidence.<br />
<br />
For now I'll leave you with this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QExil-8XaHc/Wr_OLzltiKI/AAAAAAAARXs/SKaFQITrYoQRKEkf_1gmP0i6GwVz-lFdACLcBGAs/s1600/16d.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="49" data-original-width="668" height="46" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QExil-8XaHc/Wr_OLzltiKI/AAAAAAAARXs/SKaFQITrYoQRKEkf_1gmP0i6GwVz-lFdACLcBGAs/s640/16d.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
If Oswald shot Kennedy, he had every reason to lie. Which makes you wonder why he did lie later on about several things he was questioned about. And as a side note, in the State of Texas, it is a crime to evade arrest. If the Dallas Police Department had decided to arrest Oswald at the TSBD and he left to evade arrest, he most certainly could have been charged with that as well.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHlYJKkL0IW_IMqMDaYEXv9jKYjiB5aw32V38R4L0Cq2h4vnPXX7bly9siaausmuVmEr21TGVc2VOJjHyKB9wCUqx6ip3gaDY5tIgbOL2qH_5ExkwbemK7QddOcmZmX4RvFT68E6EXIMHf/s1600/fetzercrazy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="394" data-original-width="374" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHlYJKkL0IW_IMqMDaYEXv9jKYjiB5aw32V38R4L0Cq2h4vnPXX7bly9siaausmuVmEr21TGVc2VOJjHyKB9wCUqx6ip3gaDY5tIgbOL2qH_5ExkwbemK7QddOcmZmX4RvFT68E6EXIMHf/s400/fetzercrazy.jpg" width="378" /></a></div>
<br />
To be continued.....bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-42539092466861228082018-03-30T17:02:00.002+01:002018-03-30T17:06:00.757+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 3Let's continue down the rabbit hole created by the members of Oswald's Incompetent Clowns.<br />
<br />
On page 2 of their website we see them start with this...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-P8DP9zsfcDM/Wr4-yK8jnqI/AAAAAAAARUc/7tAE6h6dZZsmS8pXuznsc_br-V9zzKpOACLcBGAs/s1600/9.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="521" data-original-width="763" height="436" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-P8DP9zsfcDM/Wr4-yK8jnqI/AAAAAAAARUc/7tAE6h6dZZsmS8pXuznsc_br-V9zzKpOACLcBGAs/s640/9.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
That's a pretty "matter of fact" opening statement by Raff* Sink. The problem is, it's the exact opposite of reality. The issue of Billy Lovelady standing in the doorway of the TSBD was settled for most logically thinking people decades ago. It's the fringe, nut jobs that think they have evidence that disproves not only Billy Lovelady's statements and testimony identifying himself in the photo, but other employees that saw the photo years ago, and identified Billy Lovelady as the mystery person in the doorway. Raff* Sink claims that there is now abundant and compelling evidence that proves, beyond all reasonable doubt, that Lee Harvey Oswald was the mystery man and not Billy Lovelady. The problem for the OIC is that they can't produce any. You will see in the posts that follow, that any "evidence" produced by the OIC is nothing more than half-assed interpretations of photographs or a manipulation of statements by people involved in the events of November 22, 1963 and it's aftermath. Raff* Sink will even deny his own statements on the subject as you will soon see.<br />
<br />
Next we have this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3Xu_x4DKgUlt-DEDZob3Fwm4COWvKMTDi6dIAdsP1-zkBqZpEUS_v9oDx0Ngm5sXuH2smgMlsKf8rcUDbZ2tEBvPoqTXCud9Lch9nySLUh6wODznNtdV6gfOxpBCITVFzoi38qCt3vSHb/s1600/10.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="472" data-original-width="702" height="430" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3Xu_x4DKgUlt-DEDZob3Fwm4COWvKMTDi6dIAdsP1-zkBqZpEUS_v9oDx0Ngm5sXuH2smgMlsKf8rcUDbZ2tEBvPoqTXCud9Lch9nySLUh6wODznNtdV6gfOxpBCITVFzoi38qCt3vSHb/s640/10.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
As always the case with the Incompetent Clowns, someone has to tell you what you are seeing. Raff* Sink has spent the better part of six years doing just that. Raff* is informing you that there is a V in the t-shirt of Billy Lovelady and that he knows this because it was the habit of Lee Harvey Oswald to tug on the neck of his t-shirt (more on this in a bit). If you do a little research on the subject, you'll find that most people see Billy Lovelady standing in the doorway with a shadow being cast over the area below his chin. Raff* Sink has been challenged by many to find examples of Lee Harvey Oswald wearing a t-shirt with a stretched neck due to Lee pulling on it but has yet to produce one. He can show you a few examples of Lee Harvey Oswald wearing a t-shirt with a stretched neckline after his arrest on November 22, 1963, but none from any time before. This challenge still stands and has yet to be fulfilled by Raff* or any of the other Incompetent Clowns (again, more on Oswald's damaged t-shirt will be discussed).<br />
<br />
<br />
Next we see this...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-e79Gz5vfJl4/Wr5SCGKuXeI/AAAAAAAARU4/TIYEz8L9FqEeH6wI1OCHHm41TL7yNq10gCLcBGAs/s1600/11.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="157" data-original-width="713" height="140" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-e79Gz5vfJl4/Wr5SCGKuXeI/AAAAAAAARU4/TIYEz8L9FqEeH6wI1OCHHm41TL7yNq10gCLcBGAs/s640/11.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Here we see Raff* get into detail about his "theyory". According to Raff*, there were multiple people "managing" the photographic record in Dealey plaza that day. Somehow, prior to the motorcade, the mysterious "they" determined it would be necessary to oversee all of the people with cameras, both still and motion, that turned out that day to see the President's motorcade. He offers no explanation as to how this was accomplished. He then states that the mysterious "they" were alarmed that Oswald was seen in a photo and somehow manipulated the photo to change Oswald to Billy Lovelady. Raff* will get into more detail later as to how this was supposedly accomplished, but anyone can research the Altgens 6 photo and see that it was taken, processed and sent over the wire to various news media well within an hour after it was taken. You will also find that this photo was used by news outlets and that some news media personnel were the first to bring to the attention of law enforcement, that Billy Lovelady actually resembled (to them) Oswald, and they felt that the authorities should look into the matter and verify that is was indeed, someone other than Oswald in the picture. So much for the mysterious photographic managers.<br />
<br />
Next, Raff* bounces back to the all important clothing....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-enYVuN2FlCw/Wr5VdJBi6jI/AAAAAAAARVE/FLy53x7Nj5A_PGeiyvbF804HNBpEinGAACLcBGAs/s1600/12.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="247" data-original-width="721" height="218" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-enYVuN2FlCw/Wr5VdJBi6jI/AAAAAAAARVE/FLy53x7Nj5A_PGeiyvbF804HNBpEinGAACLcBGAs/s640/12.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Raff* is setting you up for his magical wardrobe tour of the JFK assassination. As we will soon see, Raff* turns to his Chiropractic/Starvation Clinic/ Health Spa expertise to delve into the murky world of clandestine fashion failures and their cumulative compelling effect on this now, over 50 year old mystery.<br />
Get ready, it's going be fun.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FghADSWXsTs/Wr5WmQ5l4YI/AAAAAAAARVM/JfXF_U09cUEzwAfD3lzZMOgaISik0vzKwCLcBGAs/s1600/13.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="263" data-original-width="714" height="234" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FghADSWXsTs/Wr5WmQ5l4YI/AAAAAAAARVM/JfXF_U09cUEzwAfD3lzZMOgaISik0vzKwCLcBGAs/s640/13.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
Now I'm sure you're asking yourself....hey wait a minute. If there was an individual in the Altgens 6 photo that was actually Oswald...and the mysterious "they" wanted us to think it was Billy Lovelady, and the two looked nothing alike, and yet the identification of Oswald is based mainly on his clothing, why would they move some of Billy Lovelady's facial features to Oswald with the result being that people would still see that it was Oswald in the photo and not Billy Lovelady? Better yet, if they were moving Lovelady's facial features over onto Oswald, where was Billy Lovelady in the photo if he were not standing right where he testified he was standing and others identified him in the photo? More importantly, if they could move this or that, why in the hell didn't they just get rid of the photo? They were managing the photographic record, weren't they?<br />
<br />
Before we're done you're going to come up with many more questions so why don't you make a list and I'll provide you with several ways for you to send them to Raff*.<br />
<br />
Next, Raff* has the esteemed James H. Fetzer, PhD, explain to us how we need to think about what Raff* tells us we need to see, when looking at all of this compelling evidence we are about to have placed before us.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ftac2oaoHHM/Wr5ahv-bB1I/AAAAAAAARVY/bWtCVPSnH9Apmfv7Rsp0XBAyBoCMSjpygCLcBGAs/s1600/14.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="387" data-original-width="701" height="352" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ftac2oaoHHM/Wr5ahv-bB1I/AAAAAAAARVY/bWtCVPSnH9Apmfv7Rsp0XBAyBoCMSjpygCLcBGAs/s640/14.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
James H. Fetzer, PhD, is the least qualified individual to explain anything "scientific" to anyone. James H. Fetzer, PhD, has spent the past 40+ years creating the worst record of anyone in the conspiracy world regarding everything from the JFK assassination, the 9/11 incidents, the 7/7 bombings in the UK, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings right up to the most recent Parkland School shootings in Florida. He has joined the ranks of the Holohoaxers and has morphed into one of the biggest jokes on the world-wide conspiracy circuit. He has embraced the pathological liar Judyth Vary Baker and because of doing so, both were booted from the OIC for a period of time. It's still a big laugh to most people that he was begged to return to the OIC by Raff* Sink, when his clown college needed a boost of credibility.<br />
<br />
I'll stop here for now. Next, I'll pick up with Fetzer's continuation of his "scientific" reasoning.....<br />
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-90885529806393806972018-03-29T05:27:00.000+01:002018-03-29T05:40:14.618+01:00Founded In Fetzering Part 2The time has come to delve deeper into the pages of the Oswald's Incompetent Clowns web site.<br />
<br />
If you'd like to catch up, you can read the first part of this series here: <a href="http://www.oswaldinnocencecampaign.com/2015/11/founded-in-fetzering.html">Founded In Fetzering</a><br />
<br />
My first entry covered the statements of Gerald McKnight and his claims of evidence proving that Oswald was in front of the Texas School Book Depository, during the shooting of President Kennedy.<br />
<br />
Close examination of the evidence used by McKnight showed that his claim was based on fetzering.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fetzering">https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fetzering</a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I am going to take up where I left off and start with this screen grab of the OIC site...</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CxRbPVjLUR4/Wrwr8wbDe8I/AAAAAAAARTE/3zlea8mI1I82OAQmt7f26yM4rQqoksSmwCLcBGAs/s1600/1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="346" data-original-width="832" height="266" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CxRbPVjLUR4/Wrwr8wbDe8I/AAAAAAAARTE/3zlea8mI1I82OAQmt7f26yM4rQqoksSmwCLcBGAs/s640/1.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
In the screen grab above, Raff* Sink purposely left out one word. The word "If". Harold Weisberg, before his death, consistently used the word if, to start the sentence above.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
For proof, we need to go no further than Raff* Sink's own OIC blog...</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PM0IxrjJpr8/WrwySYfKp6I/AAAAAAAARTU/O9NSGeK3B8ozsxAAKvWVHVKIPOPSY4V0QCLcBGAs/s1600/8.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="500" data-original-width="505" height="395" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PM0IxrjJpr8/WrwySYfKp6I/AAAAAAAARTU/O9NSGeK3B8ozsxAAKvWVHVKIPOPSY4V0QCLcBGAs/s400/8.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
This was Harold Weisberg's position until he died. Trouble is, no one, including Harold Weisberg could ever find any evidence, or witness statements that placed Oswald in the doorway of the TSBD when Kennedy was shot. Weisberg was one of the first people to publicly question the findings of the Warren Commission and rightly so. The Warren Commission was not an investigation into the assassination of Kennedy. It was a government panel set up for the purpose of putting the event to bed. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Harold Weisberg and Raff* Sink have many attributes in common. One of which is they both had/have the ability to have a piece of evidence right in front of them and still get it wrong. If you read the first part of this series, you saw where I went through everything Gerald McKnight used to back up his claim that Oswald was out front when Kennedy was shot. He based his claim on Weisberg's claim and Weisberg's evidence.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
In Weisberg's book <i>Picturing the Corruption of the JFK Assassination</i>, he makes the following statement..."<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">It
seems from all of the evidence, both of the photographs and the witness
statements, that both Oswald and Lovelady were in that doorway but not at the
same place in it." </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">Weisberg morphed from "If" Altgens showed Oswald in the doorway to Lovelady and Oswald were in the doorway. He, like Raff* couldn't admit he was wrong.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">Before we go any further, let me say that I respect the efforts of Mr. Weisberg. He spent his life pointing out the inconsistencies, omissions and flat out lies of the Warren Commission and for that he should be commended. Did he get everything right? Sadly, no.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">The next quote we see on the clown page is this....</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-kpyXeTohuZk/WrxH1ATgGjI/AAAAAAAARTk/wdS8v9y0akUnZWFYP6eHWJrMDqlfsld1wCLcBGAs/s1600/2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="476" data-original-width="617" height="307" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-kpyXeTohuZk/WrxH1ATgGjI/AAAAAAAARTk/wdS8v9y0akUnZWFYP6eHWJrMDqlfsld1wCLcBGAs/s400/2.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">The screen shot and quote above comes from the movie The JFK Assassination: The Jim Garrison Tapes. Right after Garrison makes that statement we see this comparison on the screen.... </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ojgITUQYZ3A/WrxJGXaHamI/AAAAAAAARTw/LkG1aorIc4sZBcIIVmZWeMdVHhrPr3RKwCLcBGAs/s1600/3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="487" data-original-width="709" height="438" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ojgITUQYZ3A/WrxJGXaHamI/AAAAAAAARTw/LkG1aorIc4sZBcIIVmZWeMdVHhrPr3RKwCLcBGAs/s640/3.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"> Funny how JFK "theyorists"(theyorist: noun, someone who bases a conspiracy theory on the mysterious, never identified "they") always make a claim and then show something that completely undermines their position. John Barbour put together the film above and inadvertently shot Garrison in the foot by providing a picture of Billy Lovelady that confirms his place in Altgens(far right). Notice the lack of hair in the center of his head versus Oswald's full hair. Notice also the indented right temple above the jutting jaw of Lovelady in the middle photo and how it compares to Lovelady in Altgens. Also notice how Lovelady's shirt in Altgens shows the plaid pattern of the shirt he wore that day. </span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">Unfortunately for Raff*, I'm not the only one that thinks his resurrection of the Lovelady/Oswald meme has any merit....</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-on9q7YiPsLc/WrxjzGTp9yI/AAAAAAAARUA/GlZUsc_pXvs7EZlsPJTjCi40ASzM-k_XwCLcBGAs/s1600/6.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="493" data-original-width="599" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-on9q7YiPsLc/WrxjzGTp9yI/AAAAAAAARUA/GlZUsc_pXvs7EZlsPJTjCi40ASzM-k_XwCLcBGAs/s1600/6.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"> Raff* Sink shot to fame by taking a decades old claim and tried to better those that came before him. We will see over the next few blog posts in this series how Raff* has spiraled to the depths of delusion by adding to his lack of photo interpretation skills, a seriously impaired sense of reality, as he tries to convince the world that Jack Ruby didn't shoot Oswald on live TV.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">Next, we get a quote from the late, great Jim Marrs...</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0bqo0hTPWf0/WrxlxOmF3GI/AAAAAAAARUM/xo0tZ8hH-Cw-6-hZqBFR8S1JTfrLljMcgCLcBGAs/s1600/4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="478" data-original-width="772" height="247" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0bqo0hTPWf0/WrxlxOmF3GI/AAAAAAAARUM/xo0tZ8hH-Cw-6-hZqBFR8S1JTfrLljMcgCLcBGAs/s400/4.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">I really like the Jim Marrs quote....so much so that when it was announced that he joined Oswald's Incompetent Clowns, I did a blog post on his fetzering: <a href="http://www.oswaldinnocencecampaign.com/2016/05/new-oic-senior-member-jim-marrs-just-as.html">New OIC Member Jim Marrs, Just as Deceptive as Raff*</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">What follows the above Jim Marrs shot is a picture of famed paranoid, Penn Jones Jr, with a Raff* Sink quote above his head. Penn Jones was the one that originated the meme that everyone that ever drove through, saw a picture of or even heard about the State of Texas and died was somehow a mysterious death connected to the JFK assassination. Then we get a screen shot of the bat shit craziest of them all, Harrison Livingstone.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">Suffice to say, Raff* wants everyone to think that he has strong backing for his claim when in actuality, he just ripped off a curmudgeon, a delusional judge, a man who never saw a conspiracy theory he didn't like, a paranoid with a napoleon complex and a bat shit crazy whack job.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">The bottom of the initial page of Raff*'s website contains the photos and bio info for all of the Senior Members.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">Included are everyday people who I imagine have no idea they're sharing the page with serious Anti-Semites Jim Fetzer, Don Fox, Larry Rivera, Gary King, Gordon Duff, Dennis Cimino or, they're content with the Jew bashing that goes on by Chairman Rivera when he gets together with Fox, Fetzer and King to discuss various aspects of the JFK world.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 11.0pt;">The mission statement of the Incompetent Clowns hinges on Oswald in the Altgens 6 photo. Unfortunately, none of the clowns have been able to disprove that Billy Lovelady is peering out of the doorway, smirking at them.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
To be continued......</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-69329161667396093642017-12-20T09:56:00.004+00:002017-12-20T10:04:12.844+00:00The One He Won't DiscussYou can tell when Raff* Sink realizes that he's be debunked. He refuses to acknowledge the evidence.<br />
<br />
Here's a perfect example....<br />
<br />
Recently, Raff* was talking up a find by OIC Pivot-man Amy Joyce. It was huge in his eye and he touted it a concrete proof that a photo was altered. That was until my last post. I was able to find several examples of the same thing occurring in several photos. And as I predicted, Raff* replied with a feeble response.<br />
<br />
Here's Raff*....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6UuC1FtUE3Y/Wjot0SdOE5I/AAAAAAAARNk/sJyRef68Q4khUrqA4Y6zzJNAcMJLlhJhwCLcBGAs/s1600/distinctive.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="535" data-original-width="621" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6UuC1FtUE3Y/Wjot0SdOE5I/AAAAAAAARNk/sJyRef68Q4khUrqA4Y6zzJNAcMJLlhJhwCLcBGAs/s1600/distinctive.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* continues...<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEja4b7yL7DRpwCGQ5p1KJjBhuGoPWY4k8iDS8UKmh76ryT1dsrvr1DCd1WC8yq_8T6lMJ-p8HsFQJhEQ7HkFkDiyKiKuRt-gwJhE1ISoqSETEJktn4MCYOt3bd4xA039SGF8URECnru2GWa/s1600/distinctive2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="521" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEja4b7yL7DRpwCGQ5p1KJjBhuGoPWY4k8iDS8UKmh76ryT1dsrvr1DCd1WC8yq_8T6lMJ-p8HsFQJhEQ7HkFkDiyKiKuRt-gwJhE1ISoqSETEJktn4MCYOt3bd4xA039SGF8URECnru2GWa/s1600/distinctive2.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
So Raff* had to admit that lighting can change the appearance of something and make it look like a different color or shade of color but my example didn't show enough change because the hat band ribbon wasn't the same color as the hat (others that were were dismissed as the ribbon just ended, i.e., no ribbon, just hat).<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyr4G4c5AqxhtbYQLxzDNlqc4dZM8cJDjn8tKfwxxF5QGIQhTAJqdUcqofaPPEbHdgjfwBgCh1m7A8BsHOG3le4OkGhf9iYlOqQAldpIcw5aalXv0O9nP_dTt20lMqJxEcStNmJNqJfGjq/s1600/distinctive3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="351" data-original-width="335" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyr4G4c5AqxhtbYQLxzDNlqc4dZM8cJDjn8tKfwxxF5QGIQhTAJqdUcqofaPPEbHdgjfwBgCh1m7A8BsHOG3le4OkGhf9iYlOqQAldpIcw5aalXv0O9nP_dTt20lMqJxEcStNmJNqJfGjq/s320/distinctive3.JPG" width="305" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff*'s only explanation is that the grey section of the bow was painted in.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YyNtnXsr96s/WjovHa0q_QI/AAAAAAAARN4/xjF0RCc-RIQpV6hPdAqKB_wh8NR0YNquwCLcBGAs/s1600/distinctive4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="526" data-original-width="502" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YyNtnXsr96s/WjovHa0q_QI/AAAAAAAARN4/xjF0RCc-RIQpV6hPdAqKB_wh8NR0YNquwCLcBGAs/s1600/distinctive4.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
In several posts, Raff* refuses to discuss the last photo I provided.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jeu1Bg722tM/WjovbOZFfbI/AAAAAAAAROA/DIfSj8WOXiwhXSDRF03A1fJ9UoMcVC-5wCLcBGAs/s1600/166718526.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="415" data-original-width="612" height="432" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jeu1Bg722tM/WjovbOZFfbI/AAAAAAAAROA/DIfSj8WOXiwhXSDRF03A1fJ9UoMcVC-5wCLcBGAs/s640/166718526.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
That's Jack Ruby walking toward the courtroom for trial. Look at the only hat in the photo. Raff* decided not to discuss the photo above because it shows his claim as complete bullshit. But then that's how Raff* rolls.The photo above shows the center portion of the bow on the hat band to be as "rigidly distinctive" as Amy Joyce's smoking gun.<br />
<br />
Here's another taken seconds later...<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_I_TB3w_nSw/WjoyTnuGfWI/AAAAAAAAROM/plK4HDXo9L4M3Z0hfoyEWHlVCVtpTmROQCLcBGAs/s1600/166718532.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="413" data-original-width="612" height="430" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_I_TB3w_nSw/WjoyTnuGfWI/AAAAAAAAROM/plK4HDXo9L4M3Z0hfoyEWHlVCVtpTmROQCLcBGAs/s640/166718532.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Both photos were taken by a Paris Match photographer on March 1, 1964.<br />
<br />
Isn't it amazing how a totally black hat band can appear to be the same color as the hat under the right lighting conditions?<br />
<br />
Your move Raff*.....<br />
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-63355054798173991052017-12-17T14:44:00.001+00:002017-12-17T14:54:17.848+00:00It's Ribbed, for their pleasureGood 'Ol Raff* and his new pivot man Amy Joyce, have thrilled us for some time now with their joint efforts in idiocy. I'm beginning to think Amy is worse than Raff* when it comes to photo analysis.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BjRTQE2jhck/WjUSAIAmPLI/AAAAAAAARKw/JdXuXIsvIak76d2LrTagfMuUj_Vp5MQPQCLcBGAs/s1600/amy.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="240" data-original-width="173" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BjRTQE2jhck/WjUSAIAmPLI/AAAAAAAARKw/JdXuXIsvIak76d2LrTagfMuUj_Vp5MQPQCLcBGAs/s1600/amy.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
Case in point:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BUCFWGI-z-I/WjUSHLrqumI/AAAAAAAARK0/T5egZ671VCQHAqZb1flw6YT6LIf20vqyACLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="553" data-original-width="608" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BUCFWGI-z-I/WjUSHLrqumI/AAAAAAAARK0/T5egZ671VCQHAqZb1flw6YT6LIf20vqyACLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog1.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
And here...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EVsX7-zsqe8/WjUSUr1pDEI/AAAAAAAARK4/x_nBjsI-73kezLfmlugrVIytt-meD54FQCLcBGAs/s1600/raffshats%2Bcollage.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="237" data-original-width="694" height="218" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EVsX7-zsqe8/WjUSUr1pDEI/AAAAAAAARK4/x_nBjsI-73kezLfmlugrVIytt-meD54FQCLcBGAs/s640/raffshats%2Bcollage.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Raff* seems to think this is proof that someone was wearing a hat that wasn't Jack Ruby's, while they fired a gun that wasn't Jack Ruby's, with a deformed hand that wasn't Jack Ruby's at Lee Oswald, who clutched his chest with a deformed hand that wasn't Lee Oswald's, while reacting to a gunshot wound that wasn't Lee Oswald's.<br />
<br />
But wait......he then says that the photo was altered. That stripe on the ribbon in the photo on the left above, was painted in.<br />
<br />
Raff* can't make up his mind.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AVi9GKH_YPc/WjWmK6tZTQI/AAAAAAAARLI/IWIL7emVasoZVYtp9Lq7LYXcYDHg-VV9ACEwYBhgL/s1600/raffblog2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="641" data-original-width="442" height="640" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AVi9GKH_YPc/WjWmK6tZTQI/AAAAAAAARLI/IWIL7emVasoZVYtp9Lq7LYXcYDHg-VV9ACEwYBhgL/s640/raffblog2.JPG" width="440" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
We'll answer Raff*'s question in a bit. For now, let's let him tell us all about what we see, in the photos above...<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PIWZiSFw2rw/WjWnALVLO4I/AAAAAAAARLQ/bi9nCEk4FFEAjZptkNXCjYcHL6l9gHOuQCLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog3.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="195" data-original-width="504" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PIWZiSFw2rw/WjWnALVLO4I/AAAAAAAARLQ/bi9nCEk4FFEAjZptkNXCjYcHL6l9gHOuQCLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog3.JPG" /></a></div>
<br />
The statements above, prove that Raff* Sink doesn't know a damn thing about lighting. Or color. Or light wave absorption. The basement of the DPD was lit by direct overhead, incandescent lights. There were several reporters taking photographs at the time of the Jackson photo, and you can see the flashes from their equipment going off in all of the live TV footage taken of the event.<br />
<br />
But Raff* continues....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DRDS4QkGeD0/WjZyplrtLSI/AAAAAAAARLg/JwAYMMduevMPCUxFHHJ2QuYb7JF19bVZwCLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="380" data-original-width="627" height="386" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DRDS4QkGeD0/WjZyplrtLSI/AAAAAAAARLg/JwAYMMduevMPCUxFHHJ2QuYb7JF19bVZwCLcBGAs/s640/raffblog4.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Raff* attempts to show that the color difference in the Jackson photo could be because the ribbon in the hat band was actually a different color.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XVUJo8wVh8M/WjZzAkc0_yI/AAAAAAAARLk/mLoSN6lmYEgPRDQI40TSS9XqLUda67uKACLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog5.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="499" data-original-width="610" height="522" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XVUJo8wVh8M/WjZzAkc0_yI/AAAAAAAARLk/mLoSN6lmYEgPRDQI40TSS9XqLUda67uKACLcBGAs/s640/raffblog5.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The above statement is just out and out bullshit. Raff* cannot show you a single picture of James Bookhout wearing a hat. He has a picture of a bunch of people, from when Bookhout was in school, wearing uniform hats, but cannot identify Bookhout in the photo or prove that Bookhout is in the photo.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Raff* has nothing to back up his claim that Jack Ruby didn't shoot Lee Oswald.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
But he continues...</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K08v8AeO4zo/WjZ0NkCbECI/AAAAAAAARLw/0l26ws7nypgGtLaj0xQMCmlLO6GZH-yDQCLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog6.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="52" data-original-width="495" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K08v8AeO4zo/WjZ0NkCbECI/AAAAAAAARLw/0l26ws7nypgGtLaj0xQMCmlLO6GZH-yDQCLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog6.JPG" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
James Bookhout cannot be identified in the Jackson photo. Mainly, because he was upstairs when the photo was taken.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HKXaiJAA8Sw/WjZ1CggwssI/AAAAAAAARL4/hHSNzlNS_sMOfpJMWZp10Zqs-F1rEI3OwCLcBGAs/s1600/raffblog7.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="28" data-original-width="329" height="27" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HKXaiJAA8Sw/WjZ1CggwssI/AAAAAAAARL4/hHSNzlNS_sMOfpJMWZp10Zqs-F1rEI3OwCLcBGAs/s320/raffblog7.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
It's so ridiculous that Raff* has been making an issue of the hat that Bookhout never wore, for over a year now.<br />
<br />
But Raff* then contradicts everything he said about lighting and color, in this post...<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEynTM8ep225KJGM4y5yuhti_x25JsWxm1Y-F1yh4N5Vcj0ZCy5ylBDoE_nuCRf3-K4YtbZaBQ18x-ROjjBN1DbZCIuVLjWkEiuEAFCFm06k1Ie7R9I3yXBpH_SQXAYscarb1HdFieBIp9/s1600/raffblog8.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="438" data-original-width="535" height="523" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEynTM8ep225KJGM4y5yuhti_x25JsWxm1Y-F1yh4N5Vcj0ZCy5ylBDoE_nuCRf3-K4YtbZaBQ18x-ROjjBN1DbZCIuVLjWkEiuEAFCFm06k1Ie7R9I3yXBpH_SQXAYscarb1HdFieBIp9/s640/raffblog8.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And for the bazillionth time since jumping into the JFK sandbox, Raff* resorts to calling the kettle black when it comes to idiocy.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Now, Raff* claims that lighting has nothing to do with the change in the color of the ribbon on Ruby's hat and has made his default challenge to anyone that disagrees with him....pick up a camera and reproduce a change in color in a hat band ribbon.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
No need.....others have done it for us, but Raff* is too stupid to realize it.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
I offer the following....</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Hl43oKO_IDc/WjZ6Eh9YJSI/AAAAAAAARMQ/AKtZOQtCAjU1GlZ7SYs4GKojLRZqfRDwACEwYBhgL/s1600/08_06_002686%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="800" data-original-width="1007" height="508" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Hl43oKO_IDc/WjZ6Eh9YJSI/AAAAAAAARMQ/AKtZOQtCAjU1GlZ7SYs4GKojLRZqfRDwACEwYBhgL/s640/08_06_002686%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
In the photo above, you can clearly see that the strip of ribbon in the center of the bow on the hat band has taken on the appearance of being the same color as the hat. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And here.....</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5UXRMS9O-BI/WjZ7C-f0OrI/AAAAAAAARMY/Ekc26GMenqoPsvb1kJdybWSREujSg9clwCLcBGAs/s1600/Frank-Costello.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="902" data-original-width="1600" height="360" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5UXRMS9O-BI/WjZ7C-f0OrI/AAAAAAAARMY/Ekc26GMenqoPsvb1kJdybWSREujSg9clwCLcBGAs/s640/Frank-Costello.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The ribbon, in the center of the bow on Frank Costello's hat band, has turned grey.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Here is a photo of TV's Baretta, Robert Blake, in an promotion photo for an earlier project he was involved with.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wMX50K7dxlI/WjZ7ip8NqfI/AAAAAAAARMg/tlZZQJc6ja8P_jlxAE96h0Ll1p0v13GXACLcBGAs/s1600/baretta%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="418" data-original-width="600" height="444" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wMX50K7dxlI/WjZ7ip8NqfI/AAAAAAAARMg/tlZZQJc6ja8P_jlxAE96h0Ll1p0v13GXACLcBGAs/s640/baretta%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Notice the ribbon on the hat of the man standing to far right in the photo. The ribbon of the hat band has taken on the color of the hat.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The ribbon used in hat bands are many times, woven in a way that leaves the material ribbed like corduroy fabric. The ribs will cause the satin material to give off a different shine depending on which direction the light source hitting it, is located. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WeN3mwQepGY/WjZ8yYcFtzI/AAAAAAAARMs/WmwzmEADGHooZDuPtrIw2wXEjIVSZtqdQCLcBGAs/s1600/il_340x270.1391117609_55q4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="270" data-original-width="340" height="508" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WeN3mwQepGY/WjZ8yYcFtzI/AAAAAAAARMs/WmwzmEADGHooZDuPtrIw2wXEjIVSZtqdQCLcBGAs/s640/il_340x270.1391117609_55q4.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Which leads me to ask Raff*.....</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-T559uyOO1iE/WjZ9kqYb0zI/AAAAAAAARM0/7prn8wwbnW4p3Xfus1JY9zJdcVhMgPMTQCLcBGAs/s1600/raffshats%2Bcollage%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="237" data-original-width="694" height="218" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-T559uyOO1iE/WjZ9kqYb0zI/AAAAAAAARM0/7prn8wwbnW4p3Xfus1JY9zJdcVhMgPMTQCLcBGAs/s640/raffshats%2Bcollage%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Better than that....Why does this gentleman's hat band take on a different color? </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HA7jM6cXrps/WjZ-9Y-ms2I/AAAAAAAARNE/IV8jMmPCtrIdfOCJTya5ytfjKeiaQ46MQCLcBGAs/s1600/trump_jfk_files_247547832%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="488" data-original-width="620" height="502" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HA7jM6cXrps/WjZ-9Y-ms2I/AAAAAAAARNE/IV8jMmPCtrIdfOCJTya5ytfjKeiaQ46MQCLcBGAs/s640/trump_jfk_files_247547832%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
And why do these men's hat bands become the same color as the hat?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kTWm95TNG0o/WjZ_LUOM4_I/AAAAAAAARNM/dHxS5Y1HWwIbthRmgkasS0tgEBp_4_BCwCLcBGAs/s1600/trump_jfk_files_247547832%2B-%2BCopy%2B%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="488" data-original-width="620" height="502" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kTWm95TNG0o/WjZ_LUOM4_I/AAAAAAAARNM/dHxS5Y1HWwIbthRmgkasS0tgEBp_4_BCwCLcBGAs/s640/trump_jfk_files_247547832%2B-%2BCopy%2B%25282%2529.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
It's because of the weave of the satin and the light reflecting off of it, you couple of nimrods.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Why does Fat Tony's hat band take on a different color than the same color material of the bow?</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7aMKQIOpbno/WjZ_k_BpzjI/AAAAAAAARNU/zM7eOQq6L4sjsQcmbUoViuov_Rv8LiivgCLcBGAs/s1600/Fat-Tony-Salerno-Commission-trial.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="980" data-original-width="655" height="640" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7aMKQIOpbno/WjZ_k_BpzjI/AAAAAAAARNU/zM7eOQq6L4sjsQcmbUoViuov_Rv8LiivgCLcBGAs/s640/Fat-Tony-Salerno-Commission-trial.jpg" width="426" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
It's because of the weave of the satin and the light reflecting off of it. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
It's a shame that between Raff* and Amy, they can't figure out the easy stuff. Everything they don't understand is turned into a new smoking gun, greater than the last smoking gun they found. Unfortunately, between the two of them them, they haven't produced a single smoking gun...ever.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Raff will be working on a reply to this and I want you to keep this photo in mind while you read it....</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XbzUwrgVQkc/WjZ-Mnp0XaI/AAAAAAAARNA/oPZcvqoS_OwkVCflSjfvIzL1dQBIgryaQCLcBGAs/s1600/166718526.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="415" data-original-width="612" height="432" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XbzUwrgVQkc/WjZ-Mnp0XaI/AAAAAAAARNA/oPZcvqoS_OwkVCflSjfvIzL1dQBIgryaQCLcBGAs/s640/166718526.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Look at the center of the bow on the hat band on the man behind Ruby. It's grey....the same color as the hat.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Raff* and Amy........idiots.</div>
bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-31646165418483141672017-09-18T22:59:00.002+01:002017-09-18T23:51:56.897+01:00Time To School Ol' Raff*Yo Raff*...<br />
<br />
Here's a capture of a video showing Capt. Robert Crowder in 1964.....and I know that you've seen it.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nxf6W2rdgcQ/WcA_Vx8yogI/AAAAAAAARKU/JMBkQgJxomoq1rmPv-V6S8xbar56dJBWwCLcBGAs/s1600/crowder6.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="401" data-original-width="494" height="518" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nxf6W2rdgcQ/WcA_Vx8yogI/AAAAAAAARKU/JMBkQgJxomoq1rmPv-V6S8xbar56dJBWwCLcBGAs/s640/crowder6.JPG" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Hat tip to Steve Roe for the vid!</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
He's 63 years old in this video.<br />
<br />
Here he is at age 54....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uWMLd7TCJ-8/WcA_rEzitJI/AAAAAAAARKY/DmwCcE4zBI0Z0dL3NMLH7lEtik4hHefqgCLcBGAs/s1600/crowder1955.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="431" data-original-width="595" height="462" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uWMLd7TCJ-8/WcA_rEzitJI/AAAAAAAARKY/DmwCcE4zBI0Z0dL3NMLH7lEtik4hHefqgCLcBGAs/s640/crowder1955.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
In 1968 he turned 67 years old. He's the man on the left in this photo....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-doTgFRR9bzI/WcA_99KzpTI/AAAAAAAARKc/aGr-AG8AQmEXdx6lffehrts077wc10vigCLcBGAs/s1600/bookhoutatconference.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="960" data-original-width="951" height="640" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-doTgFRR9bzI/WcA_99KzpTI/AAAAAAAARKc/aGr-AG8AQmEXdx6lffehrts077wc10vigCLcBGAs/s640/bookhoutatconference.jpg" width="634" /></a></div>
In 1968, James Bookhout turned 54. He's the man on the right in the photo above.<br />
<br />
You're wrong. Your written claims about James Bookhout shooting Jack Ruby are not only wrong, but vile.<br />
<br />
We've come to expect that from you. You're a vile, disgusting excuse for a human being. Instead of admitting that you are wrong, you now want to drag a dead Texas Ranger through the mud. You're the most contemptible person I have ever seen on the net. You should slink away in shame but instead, you act as if you're proud of your slander.<br />
<br />
We all thought you hit rock bottom when you called Mary Moorman a liar....we were wrong. bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-2569552490668484882017-09-17T11:14:00.004+01:002017-09-17T17:01:09.620+01:00He went for broke, ended up a joke.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-C8koOglYdM0/Wb6cJ1T9yzI/AAAAAAAARI4/d4I14OwB9YULzd174pgcJa2UCMG3IAmfQCLcBGAs/s1600/bookhouthomicideoffice%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="960" data-original-width="659" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-C8koOglYdM0/Wb6cJ1T9yzI/AAAAAAAARI4/d4I14OwB9YULzd174pgcJa2UCMG3IAmfQCLcBGAs/s1600/bookhouthomicideoffice%2B-%2BCopy.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-78428516709528532082017-09-13T21:39:00.001+01:002017-09-13T22:05:01.542+01:00Raff*'s Bubble Just Got Burst!Thanks to Dennis Moricet for finding the photo and a huge thanks to Robin Unger for providing it to me so I could share it here.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">THIS IS JAMES BOOKHOUT.....</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-l9XgW0euJr4/WbmXYHLreXI/AAAAAAAARIE/PB1cMqaHR08-5Ji3dRBYONFazcPWBwJ0gCLcBGAs/s1600/Bookhout1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="240" data-original-width="238" height="400" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-l9XgW0euJr4/WbmXYHLreXI/AAAAAAAARIE/PB1cMqaHR08-5Ji3dRBYONFazcPWBwJ0gCLcBGAs/s400/Bookhout1.jpg" width="396" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"> That's him in the glasses on the right.</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-z-BGcEjBcfk/WbmaCZnkZ6I/AAAAAAAARIQ/6-zUzIJhM-kTkj0-t-2fiogBqlFxiCwcgCLcBGAs/s1600/Bookout2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="240" data-original-width="442" height="346" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-z-BGcEjBcfk/WbmaCZnkZ6I/AAAAAAAARIQ/6-zUzIJhM-kTkj0-t-2fiogBqlFxiCwcgCLcBGAs/s640/Bookout2.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Raff* Sink has been proven to be an idiot, once again! </span>bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-17191753286231619352017-07-05T04:14:00.001+01:002017-07-05T04:20:54.638+01:00OIC Senior Member Jack White Come Back From the Dead...to haunt Raff*<br />
<br />
After a little searching, I found this......<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VDAhrfGspQA/WVxYslCXUmI/AAAAAAAAREI/9q0hAm1nfRQNlaE7Bj5Csmlxu7rWeY7nACLcBGAs/s1600/jackwhite1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="416" data-original-width="632" height="210" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VDAhrfGspQA/WVxYslCXUmI/AAAAAAAAREI/9q0hAm1nfRQNlaE7Bj5Csmlxu7rWeY7nACLcBGAs/s320/jackwhite1.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
OIC Senior Member Jack White..."It is certain that the Moorman Polaroid is genuine. There was no time or opportunity to tamper with it..."<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7MaricynWXM/WVxZBjmeTNI/AAAAAAAAREM/u2k7VvYaBusoSgskPKhtUtJZW8OwmrGlgCLcBGAs/s1600/jackwhite4.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="405" data-original-width="563" height="460" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7MaricynWXM/WVxZBjmeTNI/AAAAAAAAREM/u2k7VvYaBusoSgskPKhtUtJZW8OwmrGlgCLcBGAs/s640/jackwhite4.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Well, would you look at that....Martin's windshield, handlebar and hand on the throttle clearly shown.<br />
<br />
Thank you Jack. I'll light a candle for ya.....bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-17620142597754359212017-07-05T01:33:00.001+01:002017-07-05T01:33:16.137+01:00Raff* continues to beat the dead horseThis idiot will never get it....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OUBHa0d0H5U/WVwxQ71IwII/AAAAAAAARDw/0NHCBAQbpLEsVHZZM28eYjtd0Hd7BNqpQCLcBGAs/s1600/shill1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="642" data-original-width="697" height="367" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OUBHa0d0H5U/WVwxQ71IwII/AAAAAAAARDw/0NHCBAQbpLEsVHZZM28eYjtd0Hd7BNqpQCLcBGAs/s400/shill1.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
I don't know of anyone that claims that your copy is the original Moorman photo.<br />
<br />
It's a copy that was made the day Moorman took her photo. The reason you see traces of the thumb print is because the actual Polaroid photo was mishandled before the fixative was placed on it or before the photo was dry. Best guess is that it was probably by Jim Featherstone or one of the people at the Courts Building that made copies of it.<br />
<br />
Most likely, someone held the photo between their thumb and forefinger resulting in acid from the person's thumb being deposited on the picture. Over time, the emulsion flaked off the positive paper resulting in this....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-G2ORRlpqeq4/WVwyjABqQII/AAAAAAAARD4/knIyjOj9kysSZdWxbTr19Bi30cMRRXQKACLcBGAs/s1600/Gordon_Smith_copy__full_frame.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="643" data-original-width="799" height="321" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-G2ORRlpqeq4/WVwyjABqQII/AAAAAAAARD4/knIyjOj9kysSZdWxbTr19Bi30cMRRXQKACLcBGAs/s400/Gordon_Smith_copy__full_frame.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Now, if you're going to skip the research part of this, maybe you can explain something.....<br />
<br />
If Martin, as you claim, is buried in that thumb print, how do you explain us seeing his windshield below the thumb print and his right hand on the throttle of the motorcycle at the bottom of the photo?<br />
<br />
We'll wait for your explanation.......bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-28416650861494428862017-07-03T12:26:00.001+01:002017-07-03T12:34:00.887+01:00Raff* Trashes His Own MemberRaff* has tried repeatedly to prove the Mary Moorman photo contains something it doesn't. Namely, the front tire of DPD Officer B.J. Martin's motorcycle.<br />
<br />
In his latest rant, we get this......<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gwmTm1S2xyA/WVooNH61AsI/AAAAAAAARDY/j7PDZgBkb8IP5q-2wQml1cWArX8gt1CfgCLcBGAs/s1600/bs1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="528" data-original-width="644" height="524" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gwmTm1S2xyA/WVooNH61AsI/AAAAAAAARDY/j7PDZgBkb8IP5q-2wQml1cWArX8gt1CfgCLcBGAs/s640/bs1.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
With this accompanying text....<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LW9R0U6Y90Y/WVoougaKqsI/AAAAAAAARDc/yAQ-dXAQ9IUaiizFcAUxrT4SENslnSOiACLcBGAs/s1600/bs2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="213" data-original-width="571" height="238" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LW9R0U6Y90Y/WVoougaKqsI/AAAAAAAARDc/yAQ-dXAQ9IUaiizFcAUxrT4SENslnSOiACLcBGAs/s640/bs2.JPG" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Hmmmmmm....that's interesting. Especially when you consider.......<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UlwRR7PumKY/WVoo9YOiLNI/AAAAAAAARDg/kzUf6U4pxE0G_sldprvgVgsrSPwneK9KACLcBGAs/s1600/bs4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="767" data-original-width="835" height="586" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UlwRR7PumKY/WVoo9YOiLNI/AAAAAAAARDg/kzUf6U4pxE0G_sldprvgVgsrSPwneK9KACLcBGAs/s640/bs4.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Crop of Jack White Document at Baylor University</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Raff* will climb over any (dead) body he can find to push his disinfo..........bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3853821172532333425.post-76685785846709277982017-07-03T04:09:00.002+01:002017-07-03T04:09:35.711+01:00Question for Raff*Ok Raff*, you've been going on for years about a fingerprint purposely placed on Mary Moorman's Polaroid to cover something up.<br />
<br />
What did they try to cover up?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7hxHwOVl874/WVmzusyrhAI/AAAAAAAARDM/qZblTtW0KmkB1OE0j18Vj0bhAK4CHV5SgCLcBGAs/s1600/Cropped_version_of_Zippo_snapshot.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="685" data-original-width="799" height="548" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7hxHwOVl874/WVmzusyrhAI/AAAAAAAARDM/qZblTtW0KmkB1OE0j18Vj0bhAK4CHV5SgCLcBGAs/s640/Cropped_version_of_Zippo_snapshot.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
Was Hargis' nose running? Was there a reflection of the shooter in Martin's windshield? Was Marilyn Sitzman playing pocket pool with her boss Zapruder? Was Babushka Lady's face reflected in Martin's windshield and it was the face of the tranny you were trying to pick up on Craig's list? Tell us Raff*.<br />
<br />
Why would a fingerprint be purposely placed over Martin's windshield Raff*?<br />
<br />
I tell you what, why don't you answer the easier question I asked you a while back....where is Martin's front tire. Don't burn your last brain cell.......bpete1969http://www.blogger.com/profile/03892135951262929278noreply@blogger.com0