Sunday, November 4, 2018

Founded in Fetzering Part 7d

As Raff* takes refuge in his latest rabbit hole, I'm going to wind down the discussion of Raff*'s reasons why Billy Lovelady can't be Billy Lovelady.....there will be future discussion on Lovelady.

Years ago, Lance Uppercut created a series of GIFs to show the very discernible pattern of Billy Lovelady's shirt. (if new here, there's a link right over there to his page >>>>>)

Lovelady's shirt had a series of horizontal and vertical, black and white stripes There was something unique about the stripes as well. The horizontal white stripe alternated as to being either above or below the black stripe.

Lance offered the following... He took sections of Lovelady's shirt and placed them side by side on the Altgens 6 photograph to show the alignment of the horizontal stripes.

Lance also produced this where he actually overlaid the sections of shirt to show how well they matched.

 Lance does good work.

Raff* has written blog after blog trying to explain how his advanced training as Chiropractor and starvation Dr. allows him greater insight into how Lovelady's fashion choice was actually Oswald's shirt. That's actually how Raff* convinced Jim Fetzer to turn his warped spotlight on Raff*. Fetzer swallowed Raff*'s bullshit about pseudo-lapels, thicker vs. thinner, it all comes down to the shirt.

Raff* made a video that was on Youtube but it was taken down after it was ridiculed by many. He remade the video. I don't normally directly link to the idiot's stuff but I'll make an exception for this...

It's the lapel folks. Different shirt means a different man. It's settled. Everyone can pack up their laser levels and card tables and reproduced limos and conferences and nonsensical books and go home.

Raff* solved it. Fetzer was waiting for the part where Raff* explained how Da Joooos were involved but got bored and moved on with his Judyth Very Faker project. Then we had Sandy Hook and Raff* was left alone on his soapbox while moths fluttered through the twisted illumination brought on by Fetzer's spotlight.

Hollow footsteps echoed across the stage and the ominous sound of an electrical throw switch left Raff* alone, in the dark. His nemesis Judyth had taken the warmth of illumination and reduced it to a cricket, in heat. Judyth stole his man. (She's a shoulda read the book).

So Raff* changed  his theyory to one of simple cabeza chicanery. Someone only altered Oswald's head to make him look more like Lovelady.

This is Raff*'s argument in a nut shell. It had to be either Oswald or Lovelady.

Well, Raff*. Lovelady was seen standing in and identified in the photo as standing in that spot, at that moment in time.

Oswald wasn't. By anyone. Ever.

More to come.....

1 comment:

  1. It is instructive to read your detailed analysis and the work of Lance and then to watch Ralph's short video. At approximately two minutes into the video, Ralph's ignorance is on display when he asserts of the Zapruder film that "if they could have altered that, they could certainly have altered the Algens photo."

    Film footage is a different medium than a photo negative. It certainly would be easy to delete frames from a film, which likely occurred to the original Zapruder film at the Hawkeyeworks facility in Rochester, New York, over the assassination weekend. But it is quite another matter to minutely alter the head and face of the man in the doorway in a photograph that Ike Altgens submitted for processing no later than 12:50pm, then was sent over the newswires at 1:05pm.

    The analysis of film alteration and photo alteration involves a different set of criteria and a detailed knowledge of the photographic technology of 1963 to demonstrate the level of sophistication in photo doctoring suggested by Ralph.

    Alas, Doctor Cinque does not possess that knowledge! As a result, his case for Oswald in the doorway of the Altgens photo is pure speculation. For this reason and others, Ralph’s work does not hold up under close scrutiny.


Anyone can comment but anyone's comment can be nice!