Saturday, March 31, 2018

Founded In Fetzering Part 4

Before I continue with the bloviations of James H. Fetzer, PhD, I want to remind you of a statement made by the OIC in my previous post...


Oswald's Incompetent Clowns are going to show the "stark dissimilarity" of Billy Lovelady and their "Doorman". And they plan to do this by establishing the likeness of Oswald and their "Doorman". But didn't they also tell us that the mysterious "they" moved facial features from Billy Lovelady to "Doorman"? Raff* Sink even mentioned that the HSCA hired anthropologists to examine the Altgens 6 photo but they never considered that the photographic managing "they", altered the photos (which must have also included the original negatives and every copy made). So, we must throw out the facial features of Billy Lovelady and rely entirely on a shirt and the t-shirt beneath it. I mean, we want to be scientific in our approach to satisfy James H. Fetzer, PhD, right? You will soon see that the scientific method goes out the window at the OIC along with every other logical thinking process.

But for now, let's get back to James H. Fetzer, PhD....


First a little background on Will Fritz's notes.
Copies of which can be found at the Mary Ferrell Foundation here: Papers of Capt. Will Fritz

Many researchers say that Fritz's notes were not written at the time of the interrogation of Oswald. Some claim that they were written by Fritz after reading reports by others (FBI, Secret Service, etc.). I make no claim as to when they were written, they are what they are.

Back to Fetzer. He states that it was the discovery by him, of these notes that caused him to take another look at the Altgens 6 photo. He continues.....

Fetzer claims to be an expert in "critical thinking" and yet his description above is nothing more than disconnected bullshit. Let's break it down...


Some have claimed that Lee was not talking about his location during the shooting but some time thereafter but that makes no sense at all because...Oswald could not have been referring to being outside with Bill Shelly before the shooting. That sums up Fetzer's critical thinking skills in a nutshell.

For a breakdown of Carolyn Arnold's statements concerning seeing Oswald go here: Founded In Fetzering

(You will notice throughout this series that the OIC, Raff* and Fetzer particularly, put full faith in Will Fritz's notes in this instance but will disregard every other statement, report or even additional comments in these notes when needed.)

So Fetzer contends that Oswald can't be talking about after the shooting because he couldn't be talking about before the shooting. Let's continue...


The OIC have decided that the 90 second time frame from shooting to Baker seeing Oswald in the second floor lunchroom is legit. Personally I think the 90 second time frame established by the Warren Commission is highly questionable but that's neither here nor there. We're going to hold the OIC to their claims.

Now it gets interesting....


Fetzer omits a lot of information in his misrepresentation of Shelley's statements. William "Bill" Shelley was interviewed on multiple days concerning his actions on the day of the assassination and testified before the Warren Commission. There is one interview report by the FBI, dated March 18, 1964, that claims Shelley said he left immediately after the shooting with Billy Lovelady, to head down to the railroad tracks. But, Fetzer ignores the fact that in that same report, Shelley denies seeing Oswald when the President was shot.
Here is that report...

Shelley also provided an affidavit on the day of the assassination to the Dallas Police, in which there is no mention of a trip to the railroad tracks. Here is that affidavit...


Shelley also testified in front of the Warren Commission representatives and here is his testimony concerning when he left the front of the building...


And most interesting of all, Shelley was interviewed specifically about the Altgens 6 photo and identified Billy Lovelady as the OIC's "Doorman"....

So as you can see, James H. Fetzer, PhD, is being very selective about the evidence he uses to make the claim that Oswald could in no way be talking about after the shooting as the time that he was out front with Bill Shelley. This is typical of James H. Fetzer, PhD, and Raff* Sink. Their description of Shelley and Lovelady being gone from in front of the TSBD immediately after the shooting will come up again as we travel through the OIC's website and their compelling evidence.

For now I'll leave you with this....

If Oswald shot Kennedy, he had every reason to lie. Which makes you wonder why he did lie later on about several things he was questioned about. And as a side note, in the State of Texas, it is a crime to evade arrest. If the Dallas Police Department had decided to arrest Oswald at the TSBD and he left to evade arrest, he most certainly could have been charged with that as well.


To be continued.....

Friday, March 30, 2018

Founded In Fetzering Part 3

Let's continue down the rabbit hole created by the members of Oswald's Incompetent Clowns.

On page 2 of their website we see them start with this...

That's a pretty "matter of fact" opening statement by Raff* Sink. The problem is, it's the exact opposite of reality. The issue of Billy Lovelady standing in the doorway of the TSBD was settled for most logically thinking people decades ago. It's the fringe, nut jobs that think they have evidence that disproves not only Billy Lovelady's statements and testimony identifying himself in the photo, but other employees that saw the photo years ago, and identified Billy Lovelady as the mystery person in the doorway. Raff* Sink claims that there is now abundant and compelling evidence that proves, beyond all reasonable doubt, that Lee Harvey Oswald was the mystery man and not Billy Lovelady. The problem for the OIC is that they can't produce any. You will see in the posts that follow, that any "evidence" produced by the OIC is nothing more than half-assed interpretations of photographs or a manipulation of statements by people involved in the events of November 22, 1963 and it's aftermath. Raff* Sink will even deny his own statements on the subject as you will soon see.

Next we have this....


As always the case with the Incompetent Clowns, someone has to tell you what you are seeing. Raff* Sink has spent the better part of six years doing just that. Raff* is informing you that there is a V in the t-shirt of Billy Lovelady and that he knows this because it was the habit of Lee Harvey Oswald to tug on the neck of his t-shirt (more on this in a bit). If you do a little research on the subject, you'll find that most people see Billy Lovelady standing in the doorway with a shadow being cast over the area below his chin. Raff* Sink has been challenged by many to find examples of Lee Harvey Oswald wearing a t-shirt with a stretched neck due to Lee pulling on it but has yet to produce one. He can show you a few examples of Lee Harvey Oswald wearing a t-shirt with a stretched neckline after his arrest on November 22, 1963, but none from any time before. This challenge still stands and has yet to be fulfilled by Raff* or any of the other Incompetent Clowns (again, more on Oswald's damaged t-shirt will be discussed).


Next we see this...

Here we see Raff* get into detail about his "theyory". According to Raff*, there were multiple people "managing" the photographic record in Dealey plaza that day. Somehow, prior to the motorcade, the mysterious "they" determined it would be necessary to oversee all of the people with cameras, both still and motion, that turned out that day to see the President's motorcade. He offers no explanation as to how this was accomplished. He then states that the mysterious "they" were alarmed that Oswald was seen in a photo and somehow manipulated the photo to change Oswald to Billy Lovelady. Raff* will get into more detail later as to how this was supposedly accomplished, but anyone can research the Altgens 6 photo and see that it was taken, processed and sent over the wire to various news media well within an hour after it was taken. You will also find that this photo was used by news outlets and that some news media personnel were the first to bring to the attention of law enforcement, that Billy Lovelady actually resembled (to them) Oswald, and they felt that the authorities should look into the matter and verify that is was indeed, someone other than Oswald in the picture. So much for the mysterious photographic managers.

 Next, Raff* bounces back to the all important clothing....

Raff* is setting you up for his magical wardrobe tour of the JFK assassination. As we will soon see, Raff* turns to his Chiropractic/Starvation Clinic/ Health Spa expertise to delve into the murky world of clandestine fashion failures and their cumulative compelling effect on this now, over 50 year old mystery.
Get ready, it's going be fun.

Now I'm sure you're asking yourself....hey wait a minute. If there was an individual in the Altgens 6 photo that was actually Oswald...and the mysterious "they" wanted us to think it was Billy Lovelady, and the two looked nothing alike, and yet the identification of Oswald is based mainly on his clothing, why would they move some of Billy Lovelady's facial features to Oswald with the result being that people would still see that it was Oswald in the photo and not Billy Lovelady? Better yet, if they were moving Lovelady's facial features over onto Oswald, where was Billy Lovelady in the photo if he were not standing right where he testified he was standing and others identified him in the photo? More importantly, if they could move this or that, why in the hell didn't they just get rid of the photo? They were managing the photographic record, weren't they?

Before we're done you're going to come up with many more questions so why don't you make a list and I'll provide you with several ways for you to send them to Raff*.

Next, Raff* has the esteemed James H. Fetzer, PhD, explain to us how we need to think about what Raff* tells us we need to see, when looking at all of this compelling evidence we are about to have placed before us.


James H. Fetzer, PhD, is the least qualified individual to explain anything "scientific" to anyone. James H. Fetzer, PhD, has spent the past 40+ years creating the worst record of anyone in the conspiracy world regarding everything from the JFK assassination, the 9/11 incidents, the 7/7 bombings in the UK, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings right up to the most recent Parkland School shootings in Florida. He has joined the ranks of the Holohoaxers and has morphed into one of the biggest jokes on the world-wide conspiracy circuit. He has embraced the pathological liar Judyth Vary Baker and because of doing so, both were booted from the OIC for a period of time. It's still a big laugh to most people that he was begged to return to the OIC by Raff* Sink, when his clown college needed a boost of credibility.

I'll stop here for now. Next, I'll pick up with Fetzer's continuation of his "scientific" reasoning.....

Thursday, March 29, 2018

Founded In Fetzering Part 2

The time has come to delve deeper into the pages of the Oswald's Incompetent Clowns web site.

If you'd like to catch up, you can read the first part of this series here:  Founded In Fetzering

My first entry covered the statements of Gerald McKnight and his claims of evidence proving that Oswald was in front of the Texas School Book Depository, during the shooting of President Kennedy.

Close examination of the evidence used by McKnight showed that his claim was based on fetzering.


I am going to take up where I left off and start with this screen grab of the OIC site...


In the screen grab above, Raff* Sink purposely left out one word. The word "If". Harold Weisberg, before his death, consistently used the word if, to start the sentence above.

For proof, we need to go no further than Raff* Sink's own OIC blog...


This was Harold Weisberg's position until he died. Trouble is, no one, including Harold Weisberg could ever find any evidence, or witness statements that placed Oswald in the doorway of the TSBD when Kennedy was shot. Weisberg was one of the first people to publicly question the findings of the Warren Commission and rightly so. The Warren Commission was not an investigation into the assassination of Kennedy. It was a government panel set up for the purpose of putting the event to bed. 

Harold Weisberg and Raff* Sink have many attributes in common. One of which is they both had/have the ability to have a piece of evidence right in front of them and still get it wrong. If you read the first part of this series, you saw where I went through everything Gerald McKnight used to back up his claim that Oswald was out front when Kennedy was shot. He based his claim on Weisberg's claim and Weisberg's evidence.

In Weisberg's book Picturing the Corruption of the JFK Assassination, he makes the following statement..."It seems from all of the evidence, both of the photographs and the witness statements, that both Oswald and Lovelady were in that doorway but not at the same place in it." 

Weisberg morphed from "If" Altgens showed Oswald in the doorway to Lovelady and Oswald were in the doorway. He, like Raff* couldn't admit he was wrong.

Before we go any further, let me say that I respect the efforts of Mr. Weisberg. He spent his life pointing out the inconsistencies, omissions and flat out lies of the Warren Commission and for that he should be commended. Did he get everything right? Sadly, no.

The next quote we see on the clown page is this....


The screen shot and quote above comes from the movie The JFK Assassination: The Jim Garrison Tapes. Right after Garrison makes that statement we see this comparison on the screen.... 


 Funny how JFK "theyorists"(theyorist: noun, someone who bases a conspiracy theory on the mysterious, never identified "they") always make a claim and then show something that completely undermines their position. John Barbour put together the film above and inadvertently shot Garrison in the foot by providing a picture of Billy Lovelady that confirms his place in Altgens(far right). Notice the lack of hair in the center of his head versus Oswald's full hair. Notice also the indented right temple above the jutting jaw of Lovelady in the middle photo and how it compares to Lovelady in Altgens. Also notice how Lovelady's shirt in Altgens shows the plaid pattern of the shirt he wore that day. 

Unfortunately for Raff*, I'm not the only one that thinks his resurrection of the Lovelady/Oswald meme has any merit....


 Raff* Sink shot to fame by taking a decades old claim and tried to better those that came before him. We will see over the next few blog posts in this series how Raff* has spiraled to the depths of delusion by adding to his lack of photo interpretation skills, a seriously impaired sense of reality, as he tries to convince the world that Jack Ruby didn't shoot Oswald on live TV.

Next, we get a quote from the late, great Jim Marrs...

I really like the Jim Marrs quote....so much so that when it was announced that he joined Oswald's Incompetent Clowns, I did a blog post on his fetzering: New OIC Member Jim Marrs, Just as Deceptive as Raff*

What follows the above Jim Marrs shot is a picture of famed paranoid, Penn Jones Jr, with a Raff* Sink quote above his head. Penn Jones was the one that originated the meme that everyone that ever drove through, saw a picture of or even heard about the State of Texas and died was somehow a mysterious death connected to the JFK assassination. Then we get a screen shot of the bat shit craziest of them all, Harrison Livingstone.

Suffice to say, Raff* wants everyone to think that he has strong backing for his claim when in actuality, he just ripped off a curmudgeon, a delusional judge, a man who never saw a conspiracy theory he didn't like, a paranoid with a napoleon complex and a bat shit crazy whack job.

The bottom of the initial page of Raff*'s website contains the photos and bio info for all of the Senior Members.
Included are everyday people who I imagine have no idea they're sharing the page with serious Anti-Semites Jim Fetzer, Don Fox, Larry Rivera, Gary King, Gordon Duff, Dennis Cimino or, they're content with the Jew bashing that goes on by  Chairman Rivera when he gets together with Fox, Fetzer and King to discuss various aspects of the JFK world.

The mission statement of the Incompetent Clowns hinges on Oswald in the Altgens 6 photo. Unfortunately, none of the clowns have been able to disprove that Billy Lovelady is peering out of the doorway, smirking at them.

To be continued......