Your analysis of the photo opinions of Ralph Cinque and Richard Hooke was measured, well-reasoned, and full of detail. In response, Ralph writes an ad hominen attack. That is his only recourse when he is unable to defend his work or engage in debate.
If there was any truth or validity to Cinque’s endless charts, diagrams, and “collages,” he should be able to defend them with scientific evidence. Of course, he has no scientific evidence because he is expressing nothing but opinions about the photos. Therefore, he relies on the ad hominen.
What an embarrassment he is to the JFK research community!
Your analysis of the photo opinions of Ralph Cinque and Richard Hooke was measured, well-reasoned, and full of detail.
ReplyDeleteIn response, Ralph writes an ad hominen attack. That is his only recourse when he is unable to defend his work or engage in debate.
If there was any truth or validity to Cinque’s endless charts, diagrams, and “collages,” he should be able to defend them with scientific evidence. Of course, he has no scientific evidence because he is expressing nothing but opinions about the photos. Therefore, he relies on the ad hominen.
What an embarrassment he is to the JFK research community!